How could the growth of Blacksburg impact our local watershed and ecology?

By Robbie Potter, Environment and Climate reporter

There are few challenges in local environmental conservation as pressing as balancing rapid urban growth with the health of surrounding watersheds. In Blacksburg, these ecosystems are feeling pressure as the town and Virginia Tech continue to develop. Southwest Virginia is also seeing an increase in migration attributed primarily to increased cost of living in Northern Virginia and remote workers deciding to live in more affordable areas, adding to the pressure.

Enter Cassidy Brandt. With a Bachelors of Science in environmental studies from Florida and a Masters of Science in plant biology from Oklahoma, she focuses her research on the intersection of humans and ecology. Now working as a museum educator, her goal is to help inform the public on the importance of environmental health and practical community action.

Brandt views small local changes like the adoption of rain gardens and permeable pavement as a crucial way to create greater change down the road.

In a recent interview, Brandt spoke about current ecological challenges in the Appalachian region, how towns like Blacksburg can continue to grow while protecting their local ecosystems, and the lack of public awareness on the important role groundwater plays in ecology.

Her comments were slightly edited for length and clarity.

What are some of the main stressors on the water quality and ecological health of local ecosystems from urban growth?

Freshwater ecosystems are particularly sensitive. It is a compounding situation where multiple stress factors, such as urban runoff and habitat fragmentation, stack on each other, pushing species out of a community and threatening ecological collapse.

Excess nutrients accumulate in rivers, streams, and ponds where they would not naturally occur. That leads to algal blooms, which deplete oxygen from the ecosystem and cause fish kills. Beyond nutrient loading, shifts in pH levels further impair the ability of native species to survive.

This is compounded by erosion and damming, especially in wetland regions where land is altered or dammed to accommodate housing developments in flood-prone areas. Altering natural waterways decreases available ecosystem space and causes species to die out when they can no longer access necessary resources.

Cassidy Brandt, waving in the middle row on the right, during an environmental research trip in The Gambia, Africa. Photo provided by Cassidy Brandt.

What efforts have been or are being made to maintain healthy water ecology in the Appalachian region.

Efforts across the Appalachian region work to counteract this damage. Numerous restoration projects focus on floodplains and wetlands harboring high biodiversity.

These initiatives often target charismatic species, such as the hellbender salamander in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina. Because hellbenders require a specific aquatic environment, protecting river habitats for them inherently safeguards the broader ecosystem for co-existing species. Targeting a charismatic species or one requiring a large, specific ecosystem helps encompass smaller species that might not receive individual conservation attention.

There is also a push for green infrastructure, such as rain gardens and green rooftops. Promoting public awareness around sustainable practices goes a long way. While an individual planting a rain garden or reducing hose usage will not solve regional issues on its own, it moves practices in the right direction. Widespread public adoption of green practices signals to larger organizations and corporations that communities value green spaces, encouraging them to adopt environmentally protective policies.

Other habitat restoration projects target native trout populations. Additionally, invasive species management is critical. While not strictly riparian, spotted lanternflies kill trees and shift ecological interactions, which ultimately affects aquatic ecosystems. Losing trees leads to root loss, destabilizing soil and increasing erosion in a cascading effect.

How can the town of Blacksburg balance growth with watershed health?

Towns like Blacksburg can balance urban growth with watershed health by integrating green infrastructure into development plans. Municipalities must expand livable spaces while leaving room for natural waterways and green areas.

Key strategies include establishing native plant gardens to anchor soil and prevent erosion, installing permeable pavement so rainwater can infiltrate ground soil and recharge groundwater reserves rather than running off paved surfaces, and creating vegetated filtration zones around lakes and ponds to filter pollutants before they enter broader waterways.

In your opinion, what is an aspect of local water management that you feel rarely gets enough attention?

One aspect of water management that receives insufficient attention is groundwater, primarily because it is not visible. Restoration projects often focus on surface issues like nutrient runoff and erosion because their impacts, such as algal blooms or fish kills, are immediately noticeable. Groundwater issues go unaddressed simply because they are out of sight.

Groundwater table fluctuations create ephemeral or vernal ponds during rainy seasons. Though temporary, these standing bodies of water are critical for amphibians like frogs and salamanders to breed. When urban development prevents groundwater recharge or introduces agricultural pesticides into these temporary pools, amphibian reproduction declines and competition intensifies in remaining habitats.

Ecology is an interlocking system. Changing one aspect of the environment creates widespread cascading effects. For instance, adding fertilizer to a field helps crops, but runoff encourages excessive plant growth in nearby ponds. When those aquatic plants die, their decomposition depletes oxygen, suffocating fish. Evaluating environmental actions requires looking past immediate results to understand broader, long-term ripple effects.

Local Bookseller to AI Companies: “Please Don’t Destroy Our Books”

By Nick Carlson, science and technology reporter

As AI companies buy used and antiquarian books in bulk to scan and then destroy, one Blacksburg bookseller is asking them to stop.

An internal Anthropic document, unsealed in Bartz v. Anthropic, describes the effort bluntly: “Project Panama is our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world.” 

Ellen Woodall, manager of Blacksburg Books, says the practice threatens more than physical inventory. It risks erasing history and altering what is truth. Without the original source material, there is no way to verify whether the information those models produce is accurate, or whether it has been altered along the way.

In an interview, Woodall discussed the threat and urged AI companies, “Please don’t destroy our books.”

Her comments were slightly edited for length and clarity.

AI is shaping how people access and receive information. How do you think training AI models on older texts, or AI more broadly, is reshaping the way information and truth get constructed?

That’s interesting, because if history is written by the victors, that’s a shaping of the truth as well. We’re seeing possibly not catastrophic failures yet, but if you’ve ever used a recipe you found off the internet and realized it was AI generated, you know it’s not always accurate information. So I think we should all be concerned about where we’re getting our information and whether it’s a source we can trust.

Is there a difference between scanning for preservation and scanning to train AI models?

I think that there are multiple differences. For example, Project Gutenberg is with the express intent to preserve the material. Whereas, for Project Panama, books are being scanned to teach AI models and then to be destroyed. There are multiple problems with that. It’s unclear to me whether the source material is being preserved. It’s unclear to everyone whether what AI models are learning is truly useful, and whether it’s ethical in the sense that some AI companies use this to skirt copyright infringement laws. That seems like a legal and moral gray area to me right now. 

How do you see this impacting copyright? 

Well, I don’t know a whole lot about it. I think a lot of people don’t know a whole lot about it. I think that some AI companies have argued that if they purchase the books and then scan them, that it’s fair use because they purchased the books. It’s unclear to me. But it seems like this is an ever evolving legal landscape that until we have some real answers, maybe we should be a little more critical about what’s happening and a lot more cautious. 

Do you worry about the possibility of AI companies changing wording or meaning in books?

That’s certainly something that can be done, and everyone should worry about that when the source material is destroyed. Whether you’re a historian or a scholar or just a regular person that wants to have a real sense of history, we should all be worried about history being changed. That seems pretty common sense. 

Do you see the mass purchase of books to train AI models and then be destroyed as a threat to your business?

Things are changing literally minute to minute with AI. I don’t see it affecting us that much in the near future because we’re not a huge dealer of antiquarian books. Our friends over in Christiansburg, Old New River Books, will probably have to deal with it, and they’ll have to deal with it sooner than we do. I have talked to a lot of my colleagues in other cities and states that are dealing with it, and it’s scary. I certainly have a very visceral reaction to the idea of books being destroyed. I don’t necessarily think that every copy of every book needs to be preserved. I used the example of James Patterson. We don’t need 50,000 copies of his 95th bestseller floating around, I think. But when we talk about things like antiquarian books where there’s one copy left, yeah, we probably don’t want to shred that. 

Why is it important to preserve physical books?

I think there are a lot of factors there. I’m biased, but for me, there’s a real aesthetic factor to it. Old books are beautiful. They’re artifacts that we can learn a lot from, not just from the text, but we can look at the binding and the script and the typeset and the materials used. These are all little bits of history that are important. You know, it’s the same reason you preserve a Mesopotamian clay tablet, even though we can just take a picture of it. I think that there is a real concern when we’re depending on duplications of information, and information that can be so easily altered. It’s nice to always have source material to go back to. 

What’s your first reaction when you hear of books being destroyed?

Certainly it’s alarming, and it’s something we keep an eye on. Like Anthropic’s Project Panama, I mean, it just sounds horrifying as a bookseller, and we haven’t been affected by it yet, but I have heard from many of my bookseller colleagues that people have been buying older books in bulk. It’s very alarming. The idea of books, particularly irreplaceable ones, being destroyed is kind of the antithesis of what we do. 

How would you react if a buyer bought books from your store with the intention of destroying them?

We haven’t had anyone approach us yet. We do have people approach us fairly regularly to buy old books. Often when people buy books in bulk, they’re either interior decorators or Instagram influencers that want something like these right behind you in the background of their shots. Because we haven’t had to deal with it yet, we haven’t consolidated a policy around it. We’re taking everything as it comes. I might feel a little odd asking somebody, what do you want the books for? Usually people will tell me. I would have serious second thoughts if someone is buying them to destroy them. That said, it depends on the books, right? Like if it’s a bunch of James Patterson books, they can have them. There are billions of those books, you know. If they’re older antiquarian books, then it would be a tough call.

Ellen Woodall, manager of Blacksburg Books. Photo provided by Ellen Woodall.

Lane Stadium cellular: The science behind game day phone signal technology

Ella Winterling, science and technology reporter

On August 24, 2026, Virginia Tech Athletic Director Brian White announced a plan to improve cellular coverage at Lane Stadium in his first address to the Virginia Tech Board of Visitors.

Cellular signal in Lane Stadium is often impacted on gamedays, with fans experiencing trouble sending text messages or making calls. A temporary solution will be put into place for the 2026 season, with a permanent solution following suit for the 2027 season.

Jeffrey Reed, Willis G. Worcester Professor and co-director of Wireless @ Virginia Tech is a professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Reed’s areas of research include cognitive radio and smart antennas. In an interview ahead of Virginia Tech’s first gameday on Sept. 5, Reed spoke about the science behind cellular technology and what impacts cellular signals.

What’s your background in cellular technology?

I’ve been here since 1992. I was here during the early days of the wireless revolution. Before that, I worked for a defense company doing military communications and got my PhD at the University of California Davis looking at interference issues. 
It turns out that the key problem with cellular communications is interference issues. So it was natural for me to get involved within commercial wireless. I’ve been around, and I’ve seen a lot of things.

What is the basic science behind cell signals?

The basic science behind it and the key why cellular works is that signals get attenuated as a function of distance. So the farther you’re away from the cell tower, the lower the signal. Eventually, it reaches a point where the signal has degraded in strength enough where you could have another signal, and that could be from another tower that uses the same frequency. So, unlike a broadcast network, like a TV station or a radio station, it tries to maximize its coverage. 
The cellular networks take advantage of being able to transmit in a limited region and reuse the frequencies. That gives us the ability to reuse the channels, which allows for a lot more users to be able to use the spectrum, because we reuse the channels.

Is utilizing large cell towers still the norm for cellular networks?

The big cell towers are no longer really being deployed very often. 
It’s the small systems, the indoor systems that are very small. They may repeat the size of a Wi-Fi access point or a little bit more. Those have become popular, and cell sites that sit on top of a light pole — those are very popular. However, the big giant cell sites that people see from the highway — very few are being deployed.

Is it common for rural areas to have worse signals than urban areas?

That’s very true. There’s still places in the state in which there is very lousy cell phone coverage, if it exists at all. Mostly what’s being deployed now are low power systems that add capacity to the network. So you could have more simultaneous users of the cellular network. That’s the big problem in the stadium. You know, a touchdown happens, and people want to take a picture and send it to their friends and family. Everybody’s using their cell phone at the same time. There’s a capacity limit. 

Are there other factors that would impact cell signals on a gameday?

If you’re moving or not, that could make a difference.
It depends too on the frequency band that is being used. Lower frequency bands tend to have better propagation characteristics. They can go further. They’re not as likely to be blocked by obstacles. Higher frequencies, on the other hand, you have those issues. They tend to be shorter ranges and blocked by signals. Most of the new spectrum that has been released over the higher frequency, that’s because we ran out of spectrum in the lower frequencies. 
So now we have to resort to the higher frequencies, and the propagation characteristics aren’t as good. 

Theoretically, what would updating the signal in Lane Stadium look like?

I suspect that they’re going to put more cell sites around. Even now, organizations such as Verizon bring in C.O.W.S. during a game. Cells on wheels. It’s a mobile cell site. They set it up to be able to handle the additional demand for the network. 
So they’ll probably deploy more infrastructure to be able to improve the capacity. They may use additional bands as well. 

Does the quality of the cell signal change depending on the provider?

Yeah. Generally speaking, the best provider depends on the area. I’m not gonna go out on a limb and tell you what I think the best provider is, but if you don’t have good cell coverage, you can think about changing providers. It’s a matter of how much infrastructure they have and what frequencies you’re operating on.

What is the future of cellular technology innovation?

We’re in the 5th generation of cellular now, and starting next year, we’ll probably start the standardization for the sixth generation. So, engineers will be working together to come up with what that 6G standard will be. 5G was developed with three things in mind:  mobile broadband access, ultra reliable and low latency communications and massive machine to machine communications. Mostly what people have seen, though, is the mobile broadband. We really haven’t seen much of the other applications yet. I suspect we will start to see them in 6G.

This interview was edited for length and clarity.

Jeffrey Reed in his office holding a cell phone. Photo Courtesy of Ben Murphy for Virginia Tech News.

The AI shift begins, transforming student life at Virginia Tech

By Erin Bailey, education reporter

On Aug. 23, 2026, Virginia Tech News announced the launch of HokieAI, a university-supported platform designed to give students, faculty and staff access to vetted artificial intelligence tools. HokieAI aims to provide users with innovation while focusing on security and ethical use. 

Features available through HokieAI range from drafting and revising content to coding support and image creation. The platform is designed to handle all levels of data, including high-risk information.

Virginia Tech urges interested individuals to complete a training course called AI at Virginia Tech: A Primer for HokieAI. The module supports AI literacy and responsible use. 

In an interview, Carl Harris the Chief Technology Architect at Virginia Tech elaborates on how HokieAI will change higher education in the foreseeable future.

Carl Harris is the Chief Technology Architect at Virginia Tech. (Courtesy of Virginia Tech, Division of Information Technology)

His comments were edited slightly for length and clarity.

What did the process of creating HokieAI look like? 

When we decided we wanted a platform like HokieAI, we looked to see what was in the market, and we decided to do competitive procurement for it, something through a request for proposals, and that process is time-consuming. Ultimately, we started in November, maybe even as early as late October, and we had responses in, reviewed and evaluated by the committee associated with that procurement, and forwarded the contract in April of this past year.

How do you envision HokieAI changing the way students approach learning, research and creative work? 

I teach a course in electrical and computer engineering. My syllabus includes details about where you can and can’t use AI. The thing I always tell my students about with respect to this affecting the experience that you’re getting is, if you’re not having to think about what you’re doing, if it’s really just asking questions and then regurgitating responses, you’re getting no benefit from that. Part of our statements around literacy for AI is this notion that you still need to be the expert in whatever domain that is. In my course, it’s an electrical engineering topic, but you still need to be providing that expertise to ground what the AI is telling you. You still need to be applying your own judgment. AI doesn’t have a sense of judgment, humans do, and you need to be thinking critically about what it’s telling you. 

How does HokieAI’s secure, university‑managed environment change the way students and faculty can safely use AI?

Students are already using things like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini for their learning and for their research. One of our goals with this was to create a space where students could do that, where whatever they’re putting into that tool, we know isn’t being used to train models. We know it’s not being retained for any sort of purpose by the provider. We’re the provider. While we do retain some of that data, it’s mostly because we need to from a legal perspective, not so that we use different models or share with anyone. When students need to use AI in their coursework, we’re ensuring through having this tool that all students have equal access, really regardless of their ability to pay or spend more money out of pocket. 

How do you see HokieAI reshaping the way faculty design courses, assignments or assessments? 

One of the things that we hope is if we’re providing a tool and everyone has access to it, that those universities providing solutions will inspire faculty to get more engaged, especially those that are either still on the fence, but maybe some of them are actually behind the fence. 

I can have much higher expectations for what I want students to gain out of projects, or how many projects they do, if I know a lot of the grunt work of doing those projects can be assisted with AI. It’s really rethinking higher education, thinking about what does higher education look like in the face of this very powerful tool. 

How does HokieAI position Virginia Tech among peer institutions in terms of AI leadership?

Even though there are other schools doing this, we’re still among the early adopters. Not every school out there has this capability, although it’s becoming more common because I think it’s a good decision that’s relatively affordable in the concept of universal access for everyone at the university that solves a lot of the has and have nots challenges.

How do you imagine HokieAI influencing the skills students graduate with?

The opportunities for students to ask the hard questions about what are the impacts of AI societally, environmentally, what should this mean in the course of my career? I think providing the space and the opportunities to explore and have really the academic discourse about these things is key to us. Not just grappling with it, but getting through solutions and answers to some of those questions.

Is there anything else you’d like to add? 

We had some students asking what happens to my prompts that go into HokieAI, and will my professors be able to get access to that? Asking those questions and thinking really about the implications of this is going to be a commitment that your generation is going to have to carry forward. Getting a deeper understanding of what are the implications, where could this go,  where do we not want it to go and where would we like to see it go? I think it’s really important for people in their university experience to be asking those questions.

More than hives and honey: How local farms like Birdsong build community through bees

Hunter Grove, science and technology reporter

A toddler in a bee suit being during an educational event at the farm

“We understand the impact bees and our farm have on the environment and our community, which is why we want to keep it going long after we are gone.”

The importance of bees to our environment, farms and overall livelihood is something many people understand, but often only in the abstract. We hear that bee populations are declining. We are told they are responsible for pollinating much of the food we eat. But it is easy to recognize that these small insects matter without ever really seeing the work they do.

At Birdsong Farms, a small scale beekeeping operation in West Virginia, that work is visible.

Owners Deano and Patti Chlepas started their apiary as a personal project in 2005. What began with four hives has since grown into a full operation, including an online store and a steady presence at local markets. But the growth of the business has not changed its focus. The priority, they say, has always remained the same. The bees come first.

At first glance, you might not think the countless rows of wooden boxes along the farm contain anything other than air, but inside, thousands of bees are working in a manner so precise and efficient, it seems robotic. The low, harmonic buzzing of their efforts represents a calculated rhythm to their operation, not unlike the trading floor of a stock exchange.

For Deano and Patti, that rhythm is not something to control, but something to understand. Their role is less about directing the bees and more about responding to them. They watch for changes in hive weight, population, behavior and honey production. Each shift can signal something different, from a strong nectar flow to a struggling queen or the presence of disease.

Over time, that attention has shaped how they run Birdsong Farms. They emphasize natural beekeeping practices, limit chemical use and place hives where bees have access to diverse forage, including wildflowers and native plants. The goal is not just productivity, but resilience.

“We put the bees first in everything we do,” said Deano Chlepas. “I treat them like my children.”

Both manage the business side while also helping translate the work of the farm to the public. Whether through their online store or face to face conversations, they help bridge the gap between what happens inside a hive and what customers see in a jar of honey.

Together, the couple has built an operation that exists as a farm, a business and an educational space.

The fields of wildflowers and vibrant trees around the farm serve as monuments to the success of the bees and the owners who care for them, each blooming a quiet record of pollination that happened weeks before anyone noticed. What looks like untouched countryside is actually the result of constant, invisible labor.

That labor can be seen outside the fields of Birdsong Farms too. On any given Saturday morning, rows of raw honey jars, whipped honey coffee, and pastries can be seen lining the table of their booth at the Main Street Farmers Market. Transactions between customers are thoughtful and deliberate, as if each purchase carried more value than what the price tag says.

People want to know what flowers were in bloom, why one jar is darker than another or how the season affected production. The answers are rarely simple. Weather patterns, rainfall, plant diversity and timing all influence the final product.

As a result, each jar of honey represents more than a single ingredient. It reflects a set of environmental conditions, a season and the work of thousands of bees.

“So many different honey related products have become more popular lately, like raw and hot honey,” said Patti Chlepas. “We would like to make sure we can give people the best, unprocessed versions of all of these.”

A small subsection of the hive where the bees lay their brood

For Deano and Patti, selling honey is only a small part of what they do. The products on the table are a byproduct of a much larger process, one that depends on maintaining healthy colonies over time.

The real work happens in the hives.

Beekeeping requires constant attention to factors that are often unpredictable. Weather can shift flowering cycles. Parasites such as varroa mites can weaken or destroy colonies. Changes in land use can reduce available forage. Each of these variables affects how bees behave and whether a hive can survive.

Beekeepers have to notice subtle changes and respond quickly. A drop in activity, a change in brood patterns or a decline in honey production can all signal larger issues. Managing those problems requires balance. Beekeepers must help the bees without disrupting the natural systems they rely on.

“It can be really dangerous for the bees if it gets super warm in winter,” said Patti Chlepas. “The bees might think it is spring and start laying their brood without having all the resources they need to survive.”

That kind of unpredictability has become more common. Warmer winters, shifting seasons and increased exposure to chemicals all affect how and when bees can function. Because of this, bees are often seen as indicators of environmental health. When colonies struggle, it usually points to broader issues in the ecosystem.

Birdsong Farms also works to make those connections clearer to the public.

The farm participates in outreach efforts tied to Virginia Tech, helping bring scientific concepts into more accessible settings. Through demonstrations and conversations, they connect everyday experiences, like buying honey, to larger ideas about ecology and agriculture.

One of the most visible examples is Hokie BugFest, where students and families can interact with insects in an educational environment. For Birdsong, events like BugFest are an opportunity to change perception.

Bees, they say, are often misunderstood. For many people, they are something to avoid or just write off. In reality, they are essential to systems that support food production, plant life and biodiversity.

Pollinators like honeybees and native bee species are responsible for the reproduction of a wide range of flowering plants. Many crops, including fruits, vegetables and nuts, depend on pollination to produce food. Without it, yields decline and food systems become less stable. Bees also support the growth of plants that stabilize soil, regulate water and provide habitat for other species. Entire ecosystems rely on the plants bees help reproduce.

“Even smaller apiaries can make a huge difference,” said Jay Wade, a certified golf course superintendent. “They can help increase local pollination and give bees safe managed spaces to reproduce and thrive.”

Additionally, bees pollinate foods rich in vitamins A and C, folate and antioxidants. Reduced access to pollinated foods can contribute to weakened immunity, higher rates of chronic malnutrition and greater risk of infectious diseases.

Many medicinal plants fall into this category, and without bees, their populations will shrink over time. This will lead to a decrease in genetic diversity, making medicinal compounds less potent and harder to source. This can cause problems not only for herbal medicine, but also for biomedical research and future drug discovery.

What makes that role more significant is how vulnerable bees are to change. Temperature shifts, pesticide use and habitat loss all affect their ability to survive. Because of that, their health often reflects the condition of the environment around them.

For Birdsong Farms, that reality reinforces the importance of both their beekeeping practices and their outreach.

What started as a small project has grown into something with wider impact. Through their work, Deano and Patti are not just producing honey. They are maintaining a system, one that connects land, insects and people in ways that are easy to overlook.

“We understand the impact bees and our farm have on the environment and our community, which is why we want to keep it going long after we are gone.”

Many people assume their individual efforts would not have an overall impact, but they can make a meaningful difference. Plant flowers that bees can use. Choose native flowering plants whenever possible. Plant flowers that bloom at different times of the year. Good examples of flowers you can plant in Virginia include cornflowers, milkweed, bee balm, asters, lavender and sunflowers.  Of course, supporting local farms and apiaries is a great way to help too.

Virginia Tech patents help researchers move discoveries beyond campus

By Timothy Kwon, science and technology reporter

Virginia Tech’s Innovation and Partnerships team helps researchers move inventions from campus labs toward patents, licenses and startups. Photo by Timothy Kwon

On Virginia Tech’s campus, an invention can begin with a professor testing a new chemical compound, an engineering team building a prototype or a graduate student trying to solve a problem no one has answered yet.

At first, the work may look small. It may sit on a lab bench, appear in a data set or exist as a rough prototype. But if the idea has the potential to become useful beyond campus, it can begin a longer journey through invention disclosure, patent protection, licensing and sometimes even a startup company.

That journey is the focus of Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, known as VTIP, and the university’s Innovation and Partnerships team. Their work sits between university research and the outside world, helping faculty and student researchers turn discoveries into products, services or companies that can reach people beyond Blacksburg.

Virginia Tech ranked No. 59 on the National Academy of Inventors’ 2025 Top 100 U.S. Universities list, with 36 granted U.S. utility patents, according to a March 19 Virginia Tech News article. The ranking gives a broader measure of the research and invention activity happening across campus, but the people behind the process say patents are only one step in moving university ideas toward public use.

Grant Brewer, executive director of LICENSE and president of VTIP, helps manage that transition.

“Taking research at Virginia Tech that has occurred, turning it into a patent, and then working with either a group of people who want to form a company or an existing company to turn that patent into a technology that helps society,” Brewer said.

Brewer said his office handles technology documents, patents, agreements and negotiations. In simple terms, VTIP helps give companies or startups permission to use patented Virginia Tech ideas through licensing agreements. Those agreements can bring money back to the university, inventors and departments, while also helping fund future patents.

For Brewer, a patent is not a trophy. It is a tool.

Grant Brewer. Photo courtesy of Virginia Tech

“A patent is a way to make an asset or an idea tangible and make that idea and that asset investable so that it can turn into something that can help people.” — Grant Brewer

That distinction matters because universities do not usually manufacture products themselves. A chemistry professor may discover a possible medical compound, but the university is not going to build a pharmaceutical company around it alone. An engineering team may design a battery technology, but the university is not going to mass-produce batteries.

Instead, the university often needs a company, startup or industry partner willing to invest time, money and risk into development. Patents can give those partners the protection they need to make that investment.

Brewer used the example of a possible cancer drug. A lab may develop a compound that shows promise, but turning that compound into an approved therapy can require years of research, clinical trials, manufacturing and federal approval. Without a patent, a company may have little reason to spend that money because another competitor could copy the compound after the expensive work is finished.

“We file patents because we want our research to end up impacting people in a positive way,” Brewer said.

Virginia Tech’s inventions come from many areas. Brewer said the university sees patents from engineering, chemical engineering, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, life sciences, medical devices, drugs and drug delivery. The work can connect to major companies, startups or local products people might recognize in Blacksburg.

Some examples are highly technical. Others are easier to spot. Brewer pointed to Hokie Lager, a Virginia Tech-branded beer created through a deal involving a recipe from the food science program and a local brewery. He also mentioned battery technologies, biodegradable feminine hygiene products, cancer therapies, wheat and soybean varieties, pork industry vaccines and exoskeletons for workers who perform repetitive heavy lifting.

Those examples show the range of innovation at Virginia Tech, but Brewer said the road from research to product is rarely simple.

“The biggest challenge is the stage of development,” Brewer said. “You can have an idea and that’s great. And then you can even get some money and test your idea in a laboratory and find out that your idea works. But then there’s a long, long way from testing your idea in a laboratory and finding out that it works to having a product package label sitting on a shelf in a store.”

That gap can create tension between researchers and companies. Faculty members may spend years developing an idea, building prototypes, publishing papers and filing patents. A company may still see the same invention as early-stage and risky.

Brewer compared the work of managing university patents to watching a little league baseball game and trying to identify which player might eventually make it to the major leagues.

“They’re showing potential,” Brewer said. “There’s all the signs that they could be great. But they’re years away from making it to the big show.”

That is where LAUNCH: Center for New Ventures becomes important. While LICENSE and VTIP help with patents and licensing, LAUNCH focuses on helping university researchers understand how an invention could become a company or reach a market.

Andrea Hill, associate director of LAUNCH, said many researchers have deep technical knowledge but may not have business development experience. LAUNCH helps fill that gap through funding, training, mentorship, market research and connections to industry or federal partners.

One key resource is the proof-of-concept grant. Hill said the program supported 12 teams this year, each with innovations that had been disclosed with the hope of patent protection and future commercialization.

“The proof-of-concept grant provides $50,000 to the team to help support those entrepreneurial endeavors,” Hill said. “Because the researchers have worked on the technical side, their entire career, and their entire collegiate career as well. And so, they don’t have the business development expertise or acumen in most cases.”

The money can help researchers explore the commercial side of their work. That can include training, market research or support from experts who help them decide whether the invention is best suited for a startup, license or another path into industry.

Hill said strong technology is not enough. Researchers also need to understand whether customers want the product, whether the timing is right and whether the invention can be manufactured.

Andrea Hill. Photo courtesy of Virginia Tech

“Even though you have a great technology, it doesn’t mean that someone’s going to want to buy it.” — Andrea Hill

That is why customer discovery is a major part of the process. Through programs such as NSF I-Corps, researchers can speak with potential customers, competitors and industry contacts to better understand the market. Those conversations can reveal whether the invention solves a problem people are willing to pay to fix.

Hill said one of the biggest gaps between an invention and a product is learning what customers actually need.

“I think the biggest challenge is finding that need and understanding what the customers, what the consumers want,” Hill said.

Manufacturing can be another obstacle. A prototype that works in a lab may not be easy to produce at scale. If a company cannot make the product efficiently, the invention may struggle to survive outside the university.

“You might have the greatest invention since sliced bread, but if you can’t manufacture it easily, you can’t make money or monetize it,” Hill said.

One example Hill pointed to was Fermi Energy, a battery technology startup connected to former Virginia Tech researcher Feng Lin and one of his graduate students. Hill said Lin developed battery technologies at Virginia Tech, disclosed multiple innovations and later formed Fermi Energy after going through university commercialization support.

According to Hill, the company used several resources, including a proof-of-concept grant, support from the Virginia Innovation Partnership Corporation and the Presidential Innovation Postdoc Fellowship Program. The postdoc period became unusually short after the team received a Department of Energy Small Business Innovation Research award, allowing the postdoc to move full time into the startup.

“It was a nice success story,” Hill said. “They’re doing well. They moved the company to Boston. And they’re continually growing.”

For Hill, success is not only measured by revenue or investment. Money matters because startups need resources to survive, but she said the larger goal is to move university research into places where it can help society.

“Getting those out of the lab and into industry so that they can benefit society, in my opinion, is a success,” Hill said.

That idea connects Brewer’s work with patents to Hill’s work with startups. A patent can protect an idea, but protection alone does not create impact. A startup can bring energy and focus to a discovery, but it still needs customers, funding and a product people can use.

Together, the process shows how complicated innovation can be. It is not just a researcher having a breakthrough. It is also paperwork, legal protection, business strategy, mentorship, market testing and risk.

For students and researchers, the path can be difficult because the skills needed in the lab are not always the same skills needed in the market. A scientist may know how to develop a compound, design a battery or build a sensor, but may not know how to talk to customers, pitch investors or form a company.

That is the gap Virginia Tech’s innovation system is trying to bridge.

In the end, the work is not only about patents sitting in a database. It is about whether ideas developed at a public research university can become cancer therapies, safer food systems, cleaner batteries, better medical devices or products people encounter in daily life.

The process can take years, and many inventions will not make it to the market. But for Brewer, the possibility of impact is the reason to keep filing patents, negotiating licenses and helping researchers move forward.

For Hill, the same idea drives the startup side of the process. Success begins when research leaves the lab and finds a use beyond campus.

At Virginia Tech, innovation does not end when an experiment works. That is often where the harder story begins.

Artemis II mission update

By Hunter Grove, Jacob Jenkins and Timothy Kwon, science and technology reporters

In this episode of The News Feed NRV Podcast, Hunter Grove, Jacob Jenkins and Timothy Kwon discuss Artemis II, NASA’s first crewed mission around the Moon in more than 50 years, and why it marks a major step in the future of human space exploration. Featuring insight from Virginia Tech aerospace and ocean engineering professor Dr. Samantha Parry Kenyon, the podcast looks at the mission’s significance, its technology, and how it may shape future lunar and Mars missions.

A vaccine to prevent opioid addiction

by Owyn Dawyot, Josie Sellers, Sarah Schrader, and Hayden McNeal. Health & Wellness Beat

Along with his research team, Dr. Mike Zhang has been working on a vaccine to help prevent opioid addiction. Stemming from his work with nicotine addiction vaccines, Dr. Zhang believes this might help kick addictions or future addictions to opioids.