Food safety after Cyclospora: Produce, local farming and safe practices

By Ella Winterling, science, technology, environment and climate reporter

In June 2026, there was a large increase in cases of Cyclospora, a parasite that is spread through contaminated food or water. While other unrelated outbreaks also occurred, the main outbreak was traced back to iceberg lettuce sourced from Mexico by Taylor Farms.

Cyclospora is a parasite thought to be connected to the food environment through human fecal contamination. How exactly the produce becomes contaminated is still being researched, with scientific theories including water sources, sanitation infrastructure and other environmental factors.

News of the outbreak led to a variety of reactions across social media and raised questions about produce safety. As researchers worked on locating the cause of the outbreak, consumers questioned what was and was not safe to eat.

Cyclospora cayetanensis oocyst under a microscope. (Photo Courtesy of the CDC via Associated Press)

“One of the biggest misconceptions is that if one type of food is recalled, every product in that category is unsafe,” said Laura Strawn, a Virginia Tech professor with a focus in food microbiology and safety. “A recall usually applies to specific products, suppliers, production dates or lot codes, so consumers should look at the actual recall notice rather than assuming, for example, that all lettuce is unsafe.”

Instead of receiving information directly from social media, a common news source for college students, Stawn advises those seeking more information on recalls and outbreaks to go directly to the source to avoid misinformation.

“My advice is to go one step upstream,” Strawn said. “If a social media post says, “CDC says this” or “FDA found that,” go to CDC or FDA and see what they actually said.”

During the cyclospora outbreak this past summer, local farmer Kat Johnson noticed an increase in new customers coming to her produce stand at the Blacksburg Farmers Market.

“There’s been a lot of new faces at the market; people that didn’t come before are maybe coming to the market to feel safer about their food,” Johnson said.

While purchasing safe foods is not necessarily a matter of buying local produce versus grocery store produce, buying food from local farmers gives consumers closer access to where their food comes from.

Vendors sell their products at the Blacksburg Farmers Market on Sept. 16. (Ella Winterling, The News Feed NRV)

“Buying directly from a local grower can give consumers an opportunity to ask questions about their growing and food-safety practices, and supporting local agriculture has many benefits, but ‘local’ itself isn’t a food-safety intervention,” Strawn said. “Lots of big grocery stores do a fantastic job and provide food at consumer-friendly prices.”

Johnson, who specializes in growing “salad-centric” produce, goes through routine safety training and follows a specific procedure to ensure that her products are safe for consumers, including annual water tests and consistent sanitization of surfaces that come in contact with harvested crops.

“When the Cyclospora thing was just coming to light in the news, I put out a newsletter to my customers,” Johnson said. “I did reiterate what we were doing and what we can guarantee and what we can’t guarantee.”

According to Johnson, local farms, while small, take their jobs “really seriously”. From routine safety trainings to taking care of the land, Johnson emphasizes the energy and thought that goes into farming.

“The large, trucked-in food system is really fragile, and I think that in times like this, or times like COVID or big natural disasters, you realize that having food grown close to home is really a matter of food security for our community,” Johnson said. “Supporting the farmers that are doing that before something bad happens is really important.”

Whether purchasing produce from a chain grocery store or a local farm stand, consumers can still practice healthy habits when it comes to produce safety, from rewashing lettuce to staying aware of cross-contamination. While Strawn recommends washing produce, she also warns of its limitations.

“Rinsing produce can reduce contamination, but it cannot guarantee that all pathogens are removed,” Strawn said. “That’s particularly true for Cyclospora, which is difficult to remove and is resistant to many common sanitizers. If a product has been recalled with instructions to discard it, washing it doesn’t make that recalled product safe to eat.”

In general, for college students looking for safe and affordable produce, it’s all about personal preference. Whether it’s organic local produce or canned vegetables, there are options for every need.

“My advice to students is to buy fruits and vegetables that fit your budget, your schedule and what you’ll actually eat,” Strawn said. “Frozen and canned fruits and vegetables can be great, affordable options too, and choosing store brands, buying produce in season and selecting foods with a longer shelf life can help reduce cost and food waste.”

While the Cyclospora outbreak caused fear in relation to buying and eating certain produce, Strawn explains that with safe practices, produce should not be something to be avoided.

“I don’t want an outbreak or recall to make people afraid of eating fruits and vegetables,” Strawn said. “The goal of food safety isn’t to make people afraid of food, it’s to understand where risks occur and figure out how we can prevent them.”

Lane Stadium cellular: The science behind game day phone signal technology

Ella Winterling, science and technology reporter

On August 24, 2026, Virginia Tech Athletic Director Brian White announced a plan to improve cellular coverage at Lane Stadium in his first address to the Virginia Tech Board of Visitors.

Cellular signal in Lane Stadium is often impacted on gamedays, with fans experiencing trouble sending text messages or making calls. A temporary solution will be put into place for the 2026 season, with a permanent solution following suit for the 2027 season.

Jeffrey Reed, Willis G. Worcester Professor and co-director of Wireless @ Virginia Tech is a professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Reed’s areas of research include cognitive radio and smart antennas. In an interview ahead of Virginia Tech’s first gameday on Sept. 5, Reed spoke about the science behind cellular technology and what impacts cellular signals.

What’s your background in cellular technology?

I’ve been here since 1992. I was here during the early days of the wireless revolution. Before that, I worked for a defense company doing military communications and got my PhD at the University of California Davis looking at interference issues. 
It turns out that the key problem with cellular communications is interference issues. So it was natural for me to get involved within commercial wireless. I’ve been around, and I’ve seen a lot of things.

What is the basic science behind cell signals?

The basic science behind it and the key why cellular works is that signals get attenuated as a function of distance. So the farther you’re away from the cell tower, the lower the signal. Eventually, it reaches a point where the signal has degraded in strength enough where you could have another signal, and that could be from another tower that uses the same frequency. So, unlike a broadcast network, like a TV station or a radio station, it tries to maximize its coverage. 
The cellular networks take advantage of being able to transmit in a limited region and reuse the frequencies. That gives us the ability to reuse the channels, which allows for a lot more users to be able to use the spectrum, because we reuse the channels.

Is utilizing large cell towers still the norm for cellular networks?

The big cell towers are no longer really being deployed very often. 
It’s the small systems, the indoor systems that are very small. They may repeat the size of a Wi-Fi access point or a little bit more. Those have become popular, and cell sites that sit on top of a light pole — those are very popular. However, the big giant cell sites that people see from the highway — very few are being deployed.

Is it common for rural areas to have worse signals than urban areas?

That’s very true. There’s still places in the state in which there is very lousy cell phone coverage, if it exists at all. Mostly what’s being deployed now are low power systems that add capacity to the network. So you could have more simultaneous users of the cellular network. That’s the big problem in the stadium. You know, a touchdown happens, and people want to take a picture and send it to their friends and family. Everybody’s using their cell phone at the same time. There’s a capacity limit. 

Are there other factors that would impact cell signals on a gameday?

If you’re moving or not, that could make a difference.
It depends too on the frequency band that is being used. Lower frequency bands tend to have better propagation characteristics. They can go further. They’re not as likely to be blocked by obstacles. Higher frequencies, on the other hand, you have those issues. They tend to be shorter ranges and blocked by signals. Most of the new spectrum that has been released over the higher frequency, that’s because we ran out of spectrum in the lower frequencies. 
So now we have to resort to the higher frequencies, and the propagation characteristics aren’t as good. 

Theoretically, what would updating the signal in Lane Stadium look like?

I suspect that they’re going to put more cell sites around. Even now, organizations such as Verizon bring in C.O.W.S. during a game. Cells on wheels. It’s a mobile cell site. They set it up to be able to handle the additional demand for the network. 
So they’ll probably deploy more infrastructure to be able to improve the capacity. They may use additional bands as well. 

Does the quality of the cell signal change depending on the provider?

Yeah. Generally speaking, the best provider depends on the area. I’m not gonna go out on a limb and tell you what I think the best provider is, but if you don’t have good cell coverage, you can think about changing providers. It’s a matter of how much infrastructure they have and what frequencies you’re operating on.

What is the future of cellular technology innovation?

We’re in the 5th generation of cellular now, and starting next year, we’ll probably start the standardization for the sixth generation. So, engineers will be working together to come up with what that 6G standard will be. 5G was developed with three things in mind:  mobile broadband access, ultra reliable and low latency communications and massive machine to machine communications. Mostly what people have seen, though, is the mobile broadband. We really haven’t seen much of the other applications yet. I suspect we will start to see them in 6G.

This interview was edited for length and clarity.

Jeffrey Reed in his office holding a cell phone. Photo Courtesy of Ben Murphy for Virginia Tech News.