Category: No category

By Nyles Stone, politics reporter

The start of the Spring 2025 semester at Virginia Tech was marked with uncertainty among students and faculty alike due to the January 20^th executive order 14151, which was aimed at dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives across all federal institutions. Many faculty grappled with the anxiety of the potential changes, while students all around the campus came together and planned for change, the professors, faculty, and staff were struggling to find a voice.  

Dr. Brandy Faulkner, Professor in the College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences talks about the uncertainty the DEI removal brings, and the amount of stress it caused to faculty when it was first announced. 

“There was so much uncertainty. Nobody really knew what was going to happen or where we would end up. And so, there was nervousness, there was some fear, there was anxiety.”

Dr. Brandy Faulkner, Professor at Virginia Tech

The executive order, titled “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing,” mandated the termination of all DEI-related mandates, policies, programs, scholarships, funding, and activities associated with federal agencies. Furthermore, all DEI-related workers were forced to go on paid administrative leave Jan. 22. The order characterized DEI as causing a divide, promoting that special treatment was being given instead of equality, a claim that drew backlash from educators nationwide. Public universities like Virginia Tech that rely on federal funding followed suit with the executive orders, with many universities getting rid of grants, academic programs, and student and faculty support services tied to DEI. 

In response to the executive order, the Virginia Tech’s Board of Visitors came together to discuss the potential outcomes, and on March 25, the Board of Visitors voted to dissolve the university’s Office for Inclusive Strategy and Excellence, which oversaw more than 700 DEI programs across the university. This led to speculations of things that could be removed from classes, funding, and student organizations. The Board of Visitors decision sparked outrage around the campus, leading to protest outside of The Inn at Virginia Tech and Skelton Conference Center, where the Board of Visitors gathered to make their decision. Students, Faculty, and Staff all gathered in dismay over the decision to get rid of the DEI programs, with over 1,000 people in attendance. 

“Absolutely, there was fear about classes like Africana Studies getting shut down, because we didn’t know,” Dr. Faulkner said. “We don’t yet have the answers to whether some of our courses are going to disappear, whether they might be renamed, whether the content will have to change. So, there is still a whole lot of uncertainty, even as we are at the end of the semester and already thinking about next year.” 

The environment of fear and speculation paralyzed many departments, with an alarming amount of distress on whether some faculty were going to able to keep their jobs. “There was a lot of hesitancy. Nobody wants to be a target,” Faulkner explained. “It felt sometimes that to even talk about was to just speculate because we had nothing concrete.” 

For Faulkner and other Virginia Tech faculty and staff, the implications of the DEI removal are deeply imbedded into their professional workplace. “That fear of the unknown is still continuing. Some things have been solidified; we know research funding for NSF grants and NEH, much of it has been taken away if it was classified as DEI-related,” she said. “Now there are more conversations about those kinds of things and how we will move forward, but you still see a lot of hesitancy.” 

Yet, even with the removal of DEI-related programs and the Office for Inclusive Strategy and Excellence, none of this was new to Dr. Faulkner.  

“As a black faculty member at a predominantly white institution, I have to assume day to day that this could happen at any time, that’s my lived experience,” Faulker said. “We know, if we study history, when there are gains, there will always be pushback and plans to undo the progress.”  

This semester brought tough conversations into the classroom for Dr. Faulkner. With the loss of a grant and gaining more evidence of what Faulkner calls the university’s “constant and open opposition” she remains determined, aiming to stay vigilant, reminding students and faculty that they must continue moving forward. Dr. Faulkner even expressed happiness for the powerful student leadership seen on campus. “I’ve been so proud to see students decide that they are going to be engaged, to do what they can to protect not only themselves, but their community.”  

When reminiscing about a moment of student leadership that stands out, Dr. Faulkner mentioned the We Won’t Go Back March for Civil and Human Rights, highlighting the march as something she was proud of. With the march being organized by multiple student organizations, Faulkner iterated her happiness for Black Mindedness founder Emon Green, with him being at the forefront of many of the university protests. 

The civil rights march stood as a reminder for Dr. Faulkner, with the thousands of students, faculty, and staff in attendance, it showed Faulkner that she is not alone, saying that “there are plenty of people who don’t want us to take these progressive steps backwards.”  

Despite the Board of Visitors decision, organizations like Black Mindedness have continued to advocate for inclusivity and community support. “Honestly, with Black Mindedness, it’s not difficult. Our organization has no affiliation with Virginia Tech, so we aren’t subject to the immediate impact of these type of decisions.” said Emon Green, a senior majoring in philosophy, politics, and economics and founder of Black Mindedness. “I think we will face a generative type of difficulty that comes with the process of building alternatives for what is being taken away with the dismantling of DEI.” 

Julia Alexander, a senior majoring in wildlife conservation at Virginia Tech voiced her frustration with the dismantle of DEI and the Board of Visitors decision. I’m disappointed by the removal of DEI positions and the insensitive impression of the Board of Visitors towards the protesting students,” said Alexander. 

While Alexander, unlike Emon, is not a part of organizations aimed at building community, she found the use of DEI beneficial when needing someone to talk to. With her majoring lying in the College of Natural Resources and Environment, a college according to an article published by College Factual, 78% of students in the College of Natural Resources and Environment are White, with African American making up only 1.7% of the college.  

“As a student at Virginia Tech, I looked to the director of DEI in my college for advice, it felt more comfortable speaking with someone who understands the perspective of a minority at a predominantly white institution,”

Julia Alexander, Wildlife Conservation Student

Alexander elaborated that DEI was something symbolic, talking about the use of cultural centers in the Squires Student Center, the living-learning communities, and the acknowledgements of an inclusive campus all around the university. Alexander, who stayed three-years in the Ujima living-learning community talked about how communities like Ujima helped get opportunities that tailored to minority groups, “It was a way to stand out and get opportunities, DEI has supported my success in college, and I wouldn’t have as many professional and personal development opportunities without it.” 

As the spring semester comes to a close and the effects of the executive order continue to unfold, the Virginia Tech campus remains caught between student outcry, and faculty hesitancy. While academic grants, programs, and voices within the institution have dwindled, many within the community are finding ways to speak out, with organizations like Black Mindedness continuing to advocate for civil justice  

“It makes me mad as hell. I’m angry. People have poured their hearts, their time, their energy into making Virginia Tech better, a more welcoming, inclusive, fair, and equitable campus, To see that work just wiped away makes me extremely angry.” 

Dr. Brandy Faulkner

By Julia Lagano, political reporter

All eyes are on Virginia as the state gears up for a high-stake gubernatorial election this November. Often viewed as a bellwether, Virginia’s off-year election offers both Democrats and Republicans an early litmus test on national political trends and voter sentiment heading into 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential race.

Regardless of the outcome, this race will be historic; Virginia will elect its first female governor. This marks a milestone in U.S. political history, given the resistance to female leadership at the national level in past presidential elections. The winner will also help shape the state’s ideological direction.

Since 1977, Virginia has a tradition of electing governors from the opposite party of the sitting president, with the exception of 2013. This pattern has made the state a testing ground for political trends, fundraising patterns, campaign tactics, and future party strategies. The state’s ever-shifting demographics, particularly in Northern Virginia, have turned it into one of the country’s most watched battlegrounds.

Although the Virginia primaries are set for June 17, both major parties have officially confirmed their candidates: Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears and Democratic former U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger.

Earle-Sears is already a trailblazer in Virginia politics. She is the first woman to serve as lieutenant governor and the first woman of color to hold a statewide office in Virginia. If she wins this race, she would be the first Black woman elected governor of any U.S. state. Additionally, it would be the first time Virginia has elected back-to-back Republican governors since Jim Gilmore in 1997.

Born in Kingston, Jamaica, Sears immigrated to the United States at the age of six and grew up in the Bronx, New York. After receiving her Master’s in organizational leadership from Regent University, Sears served as an electrician in the United States Marine Corps from 1983 to 1986.

Sears entered politics in 2001, when she won a seat in the Virginia House of Delegates by upsetting 10-term Democratic incumbent Billy Robinson. In 2018, she ran for U.S. Senate but lost in the Republican primary. She has served on the Advisory Committee on Women’s Veterans to the Secretary of Veterans, as the vice president of the Virginia Board of Education, and as the co-chair of the African American Committee on the U.S. Census Bureau.

A staunch conservative, Sears brands herself as a someone who embodies traditional Republican values. Her platform focuses heavily on education reform, economic growth, law and order, the Second Amendment, and social conservatism, specifically reproductive rights and LGBTQ+ policies.

She has closely aligned herself with Donald Trump, referring to herself as “Trump in heels.” This association may help her among the GOP, but she risks alienating moderate voters, particularly women. Democrats are framing her as too extreme for Virginia as they hope to replicate their wins from 2018 and 2020.

In contrast, Abigail Spanberger, is running as a centrist Democrat focused on bipartisanship. Born in New Jersey and raised in Short Pump, Virginia, Spanberger holds an MBA from Purdue University. After graduating, she briefly worked as a postal inspector with a focus on money laundering and narcotics.

From 2006 to 2014, Spanberger served as a Case Officer for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), working on international security and counterterrorism operations. After leaving the CIA, she was appointed to the Virginia Fair Housing Board in 2017 by former Governor Terry McAuliffe. In 2018, she was elected to represent Virginia’s 7^th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives; she served until she announced her candidacy for governor in November 2023.

Spanberger’s platform centers on economic development, education, reproductive rights, environmental protection, and public safety. Like Sears, she is prioritizing veterans’ affairs, as Virginia has one of the nation’s largest military and veteran populations.

To broaden her appeal, Spanberger has distanced herself from the Democratic Party’s progressive wing. She’s known for working across party lines and pushing for bipartisan legislation such as the Transactional Fentanyl Prevention Act, American Food Supply Chain Resiliency Act, and Supporting Federal Employees in the National Guard and Reserves Act.

“Virginia is seen as ‘purple,’ and this result can be viewed as where the nation is heading as to what’s happening in Virginia.” – John Tedesco, Director of Virginia’s School of Communication and expert in political communication.

Historically, Virginia has leaned Republican. Between 1952 and 2004, the state voted for every conservative presidential candidate, except for the 1964 election of President Lyndon B. Johnson. However, the rapid growth in Northern Virginia during the 1990s shifted the political landscape. Since 2008, Democrats have won Virginia in five consecutive presidential elections, though by narrow margins. In the 2024 presidential election, Kamala Harris defeated Donald Trump by only five points.

Virginia comprises a unique blend of rural conservatism, urban liberalism, and suburban swing voters. The state has about 320,000 full-time federal employees, with 190,000 federal jobs are based there. This job sector constitutes a significant portion of Virginia’s workforce, and the recent news has become a major issue in this year’s race.

In April, CNN reported that more than 121,000 workers have been laid off since the beginning of Trump’s second term by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). These cuts have highlighted Virginia’s vulnerable economy and made job security a central campaign issue.

Compared to a Presidential General Election, voter turnout for gubernatorial elections is significantly lower. Last November, Virginia’s voter turnout was 73%, the highest on the East Coast. However, that percentage drops considerably in state elections. Virginia state elections attracts about 42-50% of voters. In 2013, approximately 43% of registered voters cast a ballot.  

In 2021 there were record breaking numbers, with 55% of Virginians voting, the highest turnout for a gubernatorial election in about quarter century. Virginia passed 14 bills to improve voter turnout, such as 45 days of no-excuse early voting, expanding identification options, and designating Election Day a statewide holiday. Because of the state’s unique election schedule, these races are more dependent on voter enthusiasm, local issues, and campaign mobilization.

“I have only voted in presidential elections.Until now, I never realized that [the governor’s race] is held in off-years or the impact it is has on the nation.” – Alana Peyton, voter in Hanover County

To reach voters like Peyton, both campaigns are using different media strategies. Sears is relying more on traditional media, TV, radio and in-person events, to engage more traditional and older electorates. Her messaging places a large emphasis on patriotism, faith, and tradition.

On the other hand, Spanberger is embracing a digital-first approach, using platforms such as Instagram and TikTok to connect with the younger generation and tech-savvy voters. Because she is catering to a younger demographic, Sears has begun to label her as an extreme left winged, or “woke” politician.

Fundraising is crucial in elections, and this one is no exception. Expected to be Virginia’s most expensive gubernatorial campaign, Spanberger has raised around $16 million since launching her campaign in 2023. In the first quarter of 2025, she has raised $6.7 million, a record-breaking number for the first quarter of an election year. Comparatively, Sears has raised around $3.1 million, a record for the Virginia GOP.

Sears’ alignment with Donald Trump could be seen as a strength and a liability. It cements her position with Trump loyalists, it risks alienating moderates and swing voters. “There are advantages for those in strong support of Trump,” Tedesco said, “But that is not going to win over any liberal voters, and it may even scare away moderate voters.”

Voters understand what this election could mean for the future of the U.S. “[The political climate] is very tense right now,” Peyton said, “It feels like you are on one extreme or the other. Which is really frustrating because politicians should be able to work with their cohorts to improve our country as a whole, not just serve one group.”

Not only is this race highlighting key national issues like education curriculum, reproductive rights, economic development, and public safety. It is also confronting a bigger question: is there is any bipartisanship left in the United States?

“In the past year, I have become much more in tune with national politics,” Peyton said, “I plan on voting in the [gubernatorial and local] elections because ultimately, change starts at the bottom.”

Editor’s Note: Dr. John Tedesco is the Director of the Virginia Tech School of Communication which publishes The News Feed NRV.

By Evan Hull, environment, climate, and sustainability reporter

Paul Moody, founder and owner of New River’s Edge in Pembroke, and founding member of ReNew the New, has made it his mission to put locals and visitors in touch with a litter-free New River.

By Evvy Fite, Elizabeth Ann Miller and Madi Poole, health & wellness reporters.

Recently in the United States there has been a movement to ban artificial food colorings, in particular Red 40. Following the January 2025 ban on Red Dye No. 3 from food and ingested drugs, people have been speculating on whether more food dye bans are on the horizon. Sean O’Keefe, a Virginia Tech professor in the Food Science & Technology department, shared his thoughts on the bans and the health implications of food coloring.