Artificial brain brings dead composer back to life through music 

By Will Frank, Arts and Culture Reporter

Across the world, Alvin Lucier is composing his latest project at the Art Gallery of Western Australia. But here’s the twist: he died in 2021.

The exhibit is constructed around 20 wall-mounted brass plates with mallets that are periodically struck, sending a ringing vibration throughout the room. What controls these mallets is the recently deceased Alvin Lucier. In the center of the room lives a small enclosure that hosts two white blobs (“brain on a dish”), which send electrical signals to the mallets, creating his newest compositions.     

The blobs are cerebral organoids, three-dimensional structures that resemble a developing human brain. They were created using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (IPSC) technology. Lucier’s cells were donated before his death in 2021. 

Cerebral organoids on a mesh of electrodes (Photo courtesy of  media release from the Art Gallery of Western Australia)

The “Revivification” project came to fruition in 2018, when Lucier and an assembled mix of artists and scientists came up with the prospect of generating art after death. The team includes artist Nathan Thompson, Guy Ben-Ary, and Matt Gingold, along with University of Western Australia neuroscientist Stuart Hodgetts. 

Lucier, in correspondence with his team, donated his blood for the project in 2020. They reprogrammed the blood cells into stem cells, which are what the “brain on a dish” is composed of, in the middle of the exhibit. The neuronal structure rests on a mesh of electrodes, which corresponds to the mallets that sit behind the brass plates. A statement from the gallery describes the process as generating “complex, sustained resonances that fill the space with sound.”

“Experimentation in the arts is just as vital as it is in the sciences and other fields.”- Ruth Waalkes

Alvin Lucier, pictured here in 2017 in Cambridge, Massachusetts (Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)

Associate Provost for the Arts and Executive Director for Moss Arts Center at Virginia Tech, Ruth Waalkes, is responsible for setting strategic direction and creating programmatic priorities for university-level arts initiatives. She leads the overall development, artistic programming, and operations of Moss Arts Center.  

Waalkes noted, “Experimentation in the arts is just as vital as it is in the sciences and other fields. When the arts center was in development, we formulated the concept for what is now the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT) as a key element of the overall arts initiative here at Virginia Tech. ICAT has a variety of lab spaces here and supports many different types of projects at the intersections of science, engineering, arts, and design. Some projects are predominantly using art and design methods to explore a research topic, and some utilize technology and scientific data to create works of art. I do see these collaborations continuing to expand here at Virginia Tech through ICAT and other departments on campus.”

In his prolific 90 years of life, Lucier was known for his experimental edge, frequently drawing from the physics of sound in his music. One of his most famous works, “I Am Sitting in a Room,” consisted of him recording himself reading a passage, playing the tape, and re-recording it, and repeating the process until the words became too jumbled to register. He became a pivotal figure in the experimental music scene, revolutionizing the standards of how composition is thought of. His philosophy of composing focused on a shift from the traditional musical elements to experimenting and pushing the boundaries of experimenting with the properties of physical sound.

When asked how “Revivification” challenges the traditional notion of authorship and creativity, Waalkes commented, 

“Art-making that crosses the boundaries of technologies and the sciences is a big topic now, particularly with the proliferation of artificial intelligence. Many people are experimenting with these new tools, and it will be very interesting to see what paths both performing and visual artists take. In [this] case, I would say that the creative authors are a collaborative effort – Alvin Lucier who provided the concept, and plus all of [the] others who devised and implemented the installation.  However, the final product created needs to resonate with and provoke a response [from] its audience beyond the novelty of the process, I believe, to be considered a ‘successful’ work of art.” 

Through his avant-garde work with echolocation, brain waves, and room acoustics, the lines became blurred between music, science, and art. This is what garnered the attention of the artists and researchers at the Art Gallery of Western Australia.     

The team’s objective is greater than the act of preservation or paying tribute to a legend; they are, “fundamentally reimagin[ing] artistic immortality by creating a living extension of Lucier’s creative essence,” the team told Forbes

Still, it would be more accurate to attribute creativity to the “interaction” itself between humans and machines, rather than putting it solely on the robot or technology side…” – Myounghoon Jeon

The installation raises complex ethical and philosophical questions. Not only does this technology allow a lab-grown brain to compose music from the creative mind of a deceased artist, but it also challenges the status quo understanding of creativity, consciousness, and agency. 

Myounghoon Jeon, an Industrial and Systems Engineering/ Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) Professor at Virginia Tech, wrote a survey paper about robotic arts in 2017. AI technology has grown exponentially since then, and so have his thoughts on how the technology can be used. 

Jeon remarked, “In the paper, I argued that artists interact with technologies or robots (even though they don’t have consciousness) by receiving feedback and adjusting their interactions accordingly. This goes beyond just “responsiveness” or “reactivity” to something, but we can call it “interactivity”.  Still, it would be more accurate to attribute creativity to the “interaction” itself between humans and machines, rather than putting it solely on the robot or technology side, given that human input or “curation” plays a significant role in shaping both the style and meaning-making. At that time, I mentioned that it could still be difficult for machines to make a new “concept” or engage in “meaning-making”. But with recent AI advancements, my thought has evolved more. So, now I can imagine that AI can even make original concepts or artistic directions, which might imply that the interactions with those machines can be more meaningful.

The cells are not done growing either. The team is hoping to learn if they are capable of changing in response to the environment they are housed in. Noise from the gallery viewers is converted into electrical signals and is fed back into the “in vitro brain”. The group is aware of the strangeness this exhibit invites to mind. Part of their mission is to raise the questions of creativity and art: Can it exist outside the human body, and if it can, should it? They are trying to define what the ethical or philosophical guidelines should inform future collaborations between neuroscience, AI, and the arts. 

Jeon stated, “Regarding AI and artistic ownership, we should be careful when reusing or building [on] previous or existing work. With large language models (e.g., ChatGPT), it is easy to absorb and reproduce others’ ideas without clear attribution. Knowing where the source comes [from] and acknowledging it would be critical. When working with biological or neurological data (or even posthumous material), ethical collection and consent are crucial (e.g., IRB and consent procedure). In the example here, Lucier himself volunteered for this artwork, so there would be no problem. However, future applications may raise many more complex ethical challenges that we must thoughtfully navigate.

The Revivification Collective uses cross-disciplinary expertise of emerging technologies to initiate a critical public conversation of the blurred lines surrounding modern technology and its place in art culture. We are in a new age— an age of unprecedented biotechnological advancement, empowering thought-provoking and philosophically challenging notions of what constitutes art. Never before has the idea of ‘consciousness’ been as critical in defining what art is.

Jeon observed, “I agree that ‘consciousness’ is critical in creating art. At the same time, many scholars and artists recognize that ‘randomness’ or ‘happenings’ are also key in contemporary art. In the work we’re discussing, there was certainly conscious intent from the creators, researchers, and Lucier. However, the lab-grown brain cells lack consciousness, so there is no ownership or authorship there. Still, they could introduce unpredictable elements into the process (i.e., randomness). I believe that both consciousness and randomness meaningfully contribute to the art piece ultimately.”

Where we go from here is uncertain. The rapid growth of technology and the use of artificial intelligence seem to come straight from an Asimov story, but it is impossible to turn a blind eye to this technology. Discovering the reaches of this technology is the goal of this exhibit, it is meant to raise discomfort, to make us stop and reflect on humanity’s trajectory. After all, that has always been the intention of great art.

Hazing Awareness: Unity in Creating Safer Greek Life

By Bianca Campoverde, crime, safety and justice reporter

Despite various guidelines Virginia Tech has established prohibiting any act of hazing within Fraternity and Sorority Life, incidents continue to occur, with some organizations failing to adhere to policies, resulting in individual harm and chapter suspensions. As students seek connection and leadership opportunities through these organizations, maintaining a safe environment is a shared responsibility that requires both staff and students to remain vigilant, informed and committed to upholding the values of respect and inclusion. Students must stay educated and follow these guidelines to ensure that traditions do not come at the cost of student well-being.

Virginia Tech defines hazing as “any mental or physical requirement, request, or obligation placed upon an individual that could cause discomfort, pain, fright, disgrace, or injury, is personally degrading, or violates any federal, state, or local statute or university policy”. Implemented in July of 2022, Adam’s Law mandates in-person hazing prevention training for all prospective and current members of student organizations, as well as for advisors and university staff who work with these groups.

“Our office works with the chapters on an individual level to oversee and ensure active members are following policy; we hold various educational sessions throughout the year that include bringing in keynote speakers and Risk Management Institutes (RMI) covering various risk minimizing initiatives” – Eva Ruan, Coordinator for Fraternity and Sorority Life

(Photo: Virginia Tech Student Affairs)

“Hokies Don’t Haze” has become Virginia Tech’s leading initiative in the ongoing efforts to raise awareness and prevention. It plays a central role in National Hazing Prevention Week, a national observance where student groups are encouraged to host educational events, open forums, and peer-led discussions focused on what hazing can look like, harmful effects, and legal consequences. The campaign is a part of a broader movement within higher education to reshape campus culture and prioritize student safety, especially in organizations that have long-standing traditions. Reinforcing principles of mutual respect, personal responsibility, and inclusion,

“I think Virginia Tech does offer a safe environment for Fraternities and Sororities, it’s in our motto; it’s very much encouraged for organizations to hold social events to create that sense of community and care” – Ebony, Theta Tau Psi Gamma Chapter member

In compliance with Adam’s Law, Virginia Tech publicly reports all confirmed findings of hazing misconduct involving student organizations. Public disclosure is a key component in keeping transparency, holding student organizations accountable and serving as a preventative tool. By making reports available to the community, the university reinforces its commitment to student safety and ethical leadership as non-negotiable priorities. It also encourages students to speak up and report concerns, knowing the university is committed to taking action and that consequences are both real and visible.

“To ensure that our community is adhering to policies, every person is required to attend an Anti-Hazing training; participants must check out to receive credit for attendance, which our office will then cross-reference with chapter rosters in efforts to maintain accountability” – Eva Ruan, Coordinator for Fraternity and Sorority Life

If a viable claim of hazing is reported, Virginia Tech’s Office of Student Conduct will initiate a formal investigation. During this process, the organization in question may be required to suspend all upcoming events, activities and recruitment efforts until the investigation is completed. This pause is intended to protect student safety and preserve the integrity of the investigation.

If the organization is found responsible for hazing, it may face a range of progressive sanctions, depending on the severity and nature of the misconduct. These sanctions can include mandatory revisions to the chapter’s risk management plans, participation in additional trainings, and educational workshops facilitated by university departments such as Fraternity and Sorority Life, Hokie Wellness, or the Dean of Students’ Office.

In more serious cases, consequences may escalate to probation, loss of university recognition, or suspension of the chapter’s charter. The goal of these sanctions is education-based, ensuring that student organizations understand the impact of their actions and take concrete steps to prevent future violations.

“It’s [hazing policies] talked about a lot in our first few chapters as we go over policies, documents, and rule changes to make sure we are following everything that is asked of us” – Ebony, Theta Tau Psi Gamma Chapter member

Despite Virginia Tech’s extensive efforts to raise awareness around hazing prevention, not all students fully engage with or retain the information from training, creating gaps in understanding that can hinder prevention efforts.

“Not every member of fraternity and sorority life is fully informed on anti-hazing policies, as a community, we try our best to interpret them [hazing policies] to improve the way we practice them in real-life scenarios” – Juan Bonilla, founding member of Delta Upsilon at Virginia Tech

In some organizations, long-standing traditions–– such as initiation rituals, big/little reveal nights, new member challenges or competitive bonding activities–– are deeply embedded in the group’s culture and history and can create implicit expectations. Participation in these activities, especially when coupled with peer pressure, can be seen as a test of loyalty or belonging and may blur the line between harmless bonding and harmful behavior. As a result, students may feel compelled to take part in questionable activities, even if they feel uncomfortable or unsure– often not realizing that what they are experiencing could qualify as hazing under university policy or state law.

In 2024, several fraternities were found responsible for policy violations, including hazing and alcohol-related offenses, all placed under probation or deferred suspension until May 15, 2025.  Deferred suspension and probation mean the chapter remains recognized but operates under strict university oversight, has limited privileges, and must complete educational sanctions. Any further violations during this period may result in immediate suspension or loss of university recognition.

No matter how comprehensive the university’s policies may be, they can only be effective if student leaders and members actively choose to uphold them. University staff can offer resources, education and oversight, but the day-to-day culture of an organization is shaped by its members. It is up to students to ensure their practices align with university policies and to intervene when peers suggest or carry out behavior that crosses the line into hazing. This may include reevaluating traditions and questioning activities that previously went unchallenged.

“When it comes to a topic as delicate as hazing, members of both fraternities and sororities need to pitch their approaches carefully and meticulously to have more future prospective members be educated on the same policies they’re enforcing”  – Juan Bonilla, founding member of Delta Upsilon at Virginia Tech

Student leaders are meant to set the standard. They hold significant influence in shaping the values and behaviors that define their chapter’s culture. With that influence comes responsibility: to lead by example and model the kind of behavior that prioritizes safety, respect and inclusion.

In organizations where hierarchy and tradition play a strong role, new members often look to upperclassmen or executive board members to define what is acceptable. When leaders turn a blind eye to questionable behavior or partake in it, they send a clear message that rules are optional. Student leaders are uniquely positioned to create change from within, helping ensure that their organization upholds the values they promote. Which can sometimes mean making difficult decisions in calling out inappropriate behavior, reporting concerns when necessary and fostering a chapter environment where all voices are heard and respected.

“Organizations that continue to learn and build on their knowledge of hazing and risk management continue to engage in the conversation, helping  keep our community safe” – Eva Ruan, Coordinator for Fraternity and Sorority Life

Ongoing engagement is critical, as hazing prevention is not a one-time training or checklist. It is an evolving conversation that requires continuous reflection and adaptation. As student organizations change leadership each year and new members cycle in, the risks of misinformation, misinterpretation or complacency increase. Staying educated ensures that both seasoned and new members are aware of current policies, evolving best practices and the real-life consequences of unsafe or inappropriate behavior.  

By remaining active in these conversations, organizations demonstrate a commitment not only to compliance but also to the well-being of their peers and the reputation of their community. Risk management becomes more than just avoiding penalties– it becomes a tool for fostering a positive and sustainable environment that upholds the values of Greek life.

 When students, advisors and university staff work together with a unified purpose, safety and inclusion become more than policies– they become the standard.

FSL Showcase (Photo: Virginia Tech Fraternity and Sorority Life)

Pushing away from public schools: Why are parents making the switch?  

By Kyndall Hanson, education reporter  

Public schools provide a free, accessible means of education to children across the country. However, in recent years, parents have expressed worries regarding various aspects of the system, with many looking toward alternative means for schooling their children.  

“I am a proponent of public education,” said Charles Lowery, associate professor of educational leadership at Virginia Tech. “I think that public school, in a democratic republic, is a necessity – we have to have them.”  

Sitting at his desk surrounded by stacks of books, many with variations of the word ‘education’ plastered on the spine in bold letters, Lowery reflected on the mounting distrust and discontent toward public education expressed by parents across Virginia.  

“Political rhetoric drives a lot of distrust,” said Lowery. “There’s been an increase in distrust in education for years; we’ve had this misinformation about what’s happening in K-12 schools.” 

Charles Lowery, associate professor of education and leadership at Virginia Tech, in his office at the Virginia Tech School of Education.  

According to Cardinal News, Virginia’s public school enrollment rate is projected to decline 2.9% by 2029, with drops stemming from a declining birth rate and increased enrollment in private and homeschooling curricula both during and after the COVID pandemic.  

According to data obtained by the Johns Hopkins School of Education’s Homeschool Hub, from the 2023-24 to 2024-25 academic year, homeschooling rates in Virginia increased by 4.34%, with over 56,000 homeschooled students currently enrolled in the state. The data also reflects that significant gains were made during the COVID pandemic, with a 55.79% increase in homeschooled students from the 2019-20 to the 2020-21 school year. While gains have fallen since this period, the number of homeschooled students remains in the 50,000s.  

A graphic from Johns Hopkins Homeschool Hub illustrates the trend of homeschool enrollment among K-12 students in Virginia.  

Christine Berry, a parent in Virginia, started her journey with homeschooling during COVID in Pennsylvania. She describes that since then her family has tried both private and public schooling, with one of the motivators for their move to Virginia being the resources and opportunities allocated to children in public schools.  

While some families like Berry’s have moved back to the public school system, others have continued to embrace alternative means of schooling – suggesting the COVID pandemic is not the only reason for the continued decline in public school enrollment.  

“There’s an author who writes about how back in the 60s and early 70s, there was a shift from being front porch households to backyard households, Lowery described. “… I think COVID pushed us into a new generation of thinking like that, where it pushed us from ‘I feel safe in open areas’ to ‘there’s stuff out there that can not only hurt us but cause conflict between us and our neighbors.’” 

Danielle McCoy, a parent in the New River Valley with children in public school, describes that communication is a poignant issue informing her perspective on public school. McCoy says that if she could, she would “pull both of [her] boys and homeschool in a heartbeat.”  

“My issue mainly is communication and not being able to see what they’re learning,” said McCoy, describing her experience with the lessening connection between her and the school as her son moved from elementary to middle school. “I don’t feel like locally, I can’t speak for everyone in Virginia, that our school board or our administrators really listen to parents.” 

Both McCoy and Berry describe a desire to have a greater say as parents in what curriculum is being used to teach their children, voicing concerns with administrative decisions across public schools.  

“It’s like everything has moved away from actually teaching and doing a lot of hands-on things,” said McCoy, considering her two sons’ respective learning experiences. “Don’t get me wrong, there are some amazing teachers, and I support them fully, but there is a slight disconnect between what [children] need to survive in real life and what they need to learn versus what they’re learning on paper.”  

In Virginia, curriculum is determined largely at the state level, with Standards of Learning (SOLs) serving as a standard to measure students’ learning across the state.  

While these standards are determined at the state level, according to the Virginia Code, local school boards are responsible for “implement[ing] the Standards of Learning or objectives specifically designed for their school divisions that are equivalent to or exceed the Board’s requirements.”  

According to Virginia Mercury, the majority of Virginia’s school boards are elected, with 15 being appointed by local governance. For parents, this means having a say in curriculum can take place at the ballot box.  

“There is room there for parents to have a voice in curriculum…” said Lowery. “In the United States, we value independence and individualism. So, a lot of times you feel like, ‘well, my personal voice wasn’t heard.’ In a Democratic Republic, it’s everybody’s voice coming together – and we’re trying to capture that. I think education has always attempted to do that.” 

SOLs and Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) standardized testing can be a major point of contention for parents with children in public school.  

“The stress they put on these kids is insane,” said McCoy regarding MAP testing in her local school district. “I feel like they’re constantly readying them for a test, and there’s not real educating going on.”  

Lowery describes that SOLs can be limiting for educators, as well as students. With teachers and administrators working to accommodate and fulfill state testing standards, they may feel as though they have little room to explore other areas of interest with students, “narrowing” learning for children in K-12 public schools.  

“[Standardized testing] is one of the areas I’m definitely, as a parent myself, I’m very sympathetic with,” said Lowery as he recalled his experiences navigating testing as an educator and administrator. “But it’s our legislators that we vote in who keep putting this standardized testing in place, not schools.”  

With over 20 years dedicated to education, Lowery describes his worries that while many concerns with public schooling, like testing, are apparent in the system, other concerns cited in the news and across social media, like the teaching of controversial content, are often heightened by political rhetoric.  

McCoy describes that she feels the material her children are exposed to are often based on opinion, a sentiment shared by many parents across social media and in conversations surrounding the state of education: “I don’t want my kids to learn a teacher’s opinion,” said McCoy. I want them to learn facts.”  

Likewise, Berry describes feelings of wanting to have a greater say in her children’s educational environment, expressing discomfort with administrative decisions in areas surrounding what content is allowed in libraries. 

Federal and state actions in recent years regarding public school curriculum have often centered around regulating the content taught in schools, such as Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin’s Executive Order entitled “Ending the use of inherently divisive concepts, including critical race theory, and restoring excellence in K-12 public education in the commonwealth.” 

“Divisive concepts can become a catch-all for all manner of things that make us feel ‘uncomfortable,” said Lowery, discussing parental dissatisfaction with K-12 curriculum. “Learning new information, whether it’s history or algebra, can make us all in different ways feel ‘uncomfortable. Too often, it’s guided by political perspective and not pedagogical means, and that’s led  some parents to want more control over what their kids are taught.”  

Public education, at large, is facing significant changes, no matter the source – from potential funding changes with the elimination of the Federal Department of Education to greater parental involvement in learning.  

Even as some parents steer away from this avenue of schooling, public schools remain the largest source of education for children in Virginia; according to the Virginia Department of Education, 1.2 million students were enrolled in public schools during the 2024-25 academic year.  

“The part that scares me [about homeschooling] is are we making these decisions based on a lack of information or maybe too much misinformation,” said Lowery. “Are we making these decisions on our emotional decision-making facilities, or are we basing these decisions on what’s best for my child? There’s a huge world between that, and I don’t fault people who want to homeschool their children. There’s legitimate reasons why a person may want to homeschool their child, but there are also reasons that are not grounded in the reality of what happens in education.”  

A new era of art

By Caroline Herbert, arts and culture reporter

The above image was generated by ChatGPT.

“The great thing about AI is it makes a lot of things more convenient, and the bad thing about AI is it makes a lot of things too convenient.”

-Dr. Justin Horn, Professor of AI Ethics at Virginia Tech

Dr. Justin Horn, a Professor of AI Ethics at Virginia Tech, recently had an eye-opening experience with artificial intelligence. 

“I was thinking about unique ways to teach something in particular for class and thought it would be useful to have a cartoon conversation explaining the material I was teaching,” Horn said. “I asked ChatGPT to create this image, and it created exactly what I needed in a matter of seconds.” 

As tools like ChatGPT and DALL-E become more widely used, professionals are incorporating AI into their daily workflow. The nature of human creativity is shifting fast. This has sparked a growing debate: Are we witnessing the expansion of art, or its transition into automation?  

AI’s ability to generate visual art has created a new creative space, where machine-generated and human-made art intersect. For some, this signals a new era of artistic innovation. For others, it raises difficult questions about authorship, value and authenticity. 

AI is changing how creators think, conceptualize and execute their work, presenting both opportunity and controversy. 

Savannah Penven, exhibitions program manager at the Moss Arts Center, has extensive experience working with various artists. While the Moss hasn’t actively sought artists who work with AI, she’s observed firsthand how technology is influencing creative work. 

“Artists who are already engaging in visual art have found ways to use AI to their advantage,” Penven said. “But also, a lot of people who haven’t really engaged with the arts before are dipping their toes in, and I think that comes from a feeling of not being able to create art themselves.” 

Penven’s observations highlight one defining characteristic of AI tools: accessibility. Now, anyone with an idea and just a few descriptive words can produce high-quality art or design in seconds. For some, that’s empowering. For others, it’s worrisome.  

Regardless of viewpoint, the ability to instantly create polished, visually appealing art from a text prompt is significantly transforming artistic expression and impacting the creative process. 

“We’re already at a point where AI-generated music and art can fool professionals. That’s one of the things I find most unnerving, that even the most human forms of expression are being created by machines.” 

-Dr. Justin Horn 

Horn explained that most generative AI models are trained on massive datasets, often created using artists’ original work without permission, compensation or credit. This raises several questions about ownership.  

“When someone creates a work of art, there’s a sense in which they should own it,” Horn said. “But a lot of the AI systems we have now are trained on huge quantities of artwork, and we don’t have any system in place for compensating the original creators.” 

In 2023, several artists filed lawsuits against companies including Stability AI, Midjourney and DeviantArt, alleging that their artwork was used to train AI image-generation models without permission. The case, Andersen v. Stability AI, highlights the legal gaps surrounding intellectual property and creative AI. According to the Copyright Alliance, the plaintiffs claim their work was repurposed without consent. 

A report by the Interaction Design Foundation, states that AI-generated art “challenges traditional notions of authorship, intent, and ownership.”  

One Van Gogh painting (far right) alongside two pieces of AI-generated art: Image retrieved from Goldpenguin.org 

While AI can mimic artistic styles, Penven argues it still lacks one essential element: emotion. Human art, she said, remains distinctive because of its emotional drive. 

“The core draw of art is still its personal, emotional connection to the viewer,” she said. 

Penven said AI can serve as a useful brainstorming tool, but the line between collaboration and creation matters.  

“AI can be helpful in conceptualizing different ways of creating art,” she said. “But when it’s used just to produce a final product without any intention behind it, that’s when it gets messy.” 

She compared today’s debates about AI to the 19th-century resistance against photography, another technology that disrupted how people viewed art.  

“There’s always been this battle of, ‘Is it art or is it not?’” Penven said. “AI is just the next chapter, just as photography was a new chapter at one point in time.” 

“Do people want to view something that is aesthetically pleasing, which AI can certainly generate, or something that reflects the inner world of an artist?” 

-Savannah Penven

Beyond the arts, Horn sees additional risks, especially as an educator. He worries about students taking advantage of AI on assignments, but his deeper concern is the long-term cost of dependence.  

“It’s very easy to let AI do things for us rather than struggle through them ourselves,” Horn said. “And if we don’t struggle, we risk losing the ability altogether.” 

Even something as intimate as a love letter, he warned, could soon become a task people will be tempted to use AI to write. 

Whether it’s composing letters, conducting research or developing original ideas, Horn cautioned that consistent shortcuts can hinder one’s creativity.

“We’re moving into a world where it’s going to be very tempting for things not to come from human beings,” he said. 

Horn compared the future of art to the fashion industry. While custom-made clothing still exists, most people buy mass-produced clothing made by machines. 

“I don’t think human art will die,” he said. “But it might be seen as more of a luxury.” 

Despite his concerns, Horn doesn’t reject AI altogether. 

“In medicine, AI can detect cancer earlier than a human can,” Horn said. “If the goal is to save lives, I don’t care if it’s a machine or a person doing the diagnosing.” 

Still, he noted, there’s a profound difference between scanning a medical image and composing a symphony. 

That difference, Penven believes, is what will make human art irreplaceable.  

“There’s always going to be people who want to see something created by a human,” she said. “We have this intrinsic drive to create art.” 

“AI is here,” she added. “And we’re going to keep finding new ways to deal with it.” 

As the creative world adapts, one thing remains clear: AI isn’t going away, and neither are the artists.  

Montgomery County Animal Care and Adoption Center Restores Hope and Health for Local Animals

By: Sophia Gerni, Crime, Safety, and Justice Reporter.

The Montgomery county animal care and adoption center sees it all. From the good to the bad, their goal is to give all animals a second chance at life. Many of the animals come to the shelter with heart wrenching stories behind them. The shelter wants to help and that is just what they will do. 

Editor’s note: This story includes images of neglected animals some viewers may find disturbing.

Women Take Center Stage in Virginia Politics

By Julia Lagano, political reporter

Former U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger (left) and Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears. (Photos by Parker Michels-Boyce and Mechelle Hankerson for the Virginia Mercury).

All eyes are on Virginia as the state gears up for a high-stake gubernatorial election this November. Often viewed as a bellwether, Virginia’s off-year election offers both Democrats and Republicans an early litmus test on national political trends and voter sentiment heading into 2026 midterms and 2028 presidential race.

Regardless of the outcome, this race will be historic; Virginia will elect its first female governor. This marks a milestone in U.S. political history, given the resistance to female leadership at the national level in past presidential elections. The winner will also help shape the state’s ideological direction.

Since 1977, Virginia has a tradition of electing governors from the opposite party of the sitting president, with the exception of 2013. This pattern has made the state a testing ground for political trends, fundraising patterns, campaign tactics, and future party strategies. The state’s ever-shifting demographics, particularly in Northern Virginia, have turned it into one of the country’s most watched battlegrounds.

Although the Virginia primaries are set for June 17, both major parties have officially confirmed their candidates: Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears and Democratic former U.S. Representative Abigail Spanberger.

Earle-Sears is already a trailblazer in Virginia politics. She is the first woman to serve as lieutenant governor and the first woman of color to hold a statewide office in Virginia. If she wins this race, she would be the first Black woman elected governor of any U.S. state. Additionally, it would be the first time Virginia has elected back-to-back Republican governors since Jim Gilmore in 1997.

Born in Kingston, Jamaica, Sears immigrated to the United States at the age of six and grew up in the Bronx, New York. After receiving her Master’s in organizational leadership from Regent University, Sears served as an electrician in the United States Marine Corps from 1983 to 1986.

Sears entered politics in 2001, when she won a seat in the Virginia House of Delegates by upsetting 10-term Democratic incumbent Billy Robinson. In 2018, she ran for U.S. Senate but lost in the Republican primary. She has served on the Advisory Committee on Women’s Veterans to the Secretary of Veterans, as the vice president of the Virginia Board of Education, and as the co-chair of the African American Committee on the U.S. Census Bureau.

A staunch conservative, Sears brands herself as a someone who embodies traditional Republican values. Her platform focuses heavily on education reform, economic growth, law and order, the Second Amendment, and social conservatism, specifically reproductive rights and LGBTQ+ policies.

She has closely aligned herself with Donald Trump, referring to herself as “Trump in heels.” This association may help her among the GOP, but she risks alienating moderate voters, particularly women. Democrats are framing her as too extreme for Virginia as they hope to replicate their wins from 2018 and 2020.

In contrast, Abigail Spanberger, is running as a centrist Democrat focused on bipartisanship. Born in New Jersey and raised in Short Pump, Virginia, Spanberger holds an MBA from Purdue University. After graduating, she briefly worked as a postal inspector with a focus on money laundering and narcotics.

From 2006 to 2014, Spanberger served as a Case Officer for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), working on international security and counterterrorism operations. After leaving the CIA, she was appointed to the Virginia Fair Housing Board in 2017 by former Governor Terry McAuliffe. In 2018, she was elected to represent Virginia’s 7th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives; she served until she announced her candidacy for governor in November 2023.

Spanberger’s platform centers on economic development, education, reproductive rights, environmental protection, and public safety. Like Sears, she is prioritizing veterans’ affairs, as Virginia has one of the nation’s largest military and veteran populations.

To broaden her appeal, Spanberger has distanced herself from the Democratic Party’s progressive wing. She’s known for working across party lines and pushing for bipartisan legislation such as the Transactional Fentanyl Prevention Act, American Food Supply Chain Resiliency Act, and Supporting Federal Employees in the National Guard and Reserves Act.

“Virginia is seen as ‘purple,’ and this result can be viewed as where the nation is heading as to what’s happening in Virginia.” – John Tedesco, Director of Virginia’s School of Communication and expert in political communication.

Historically, Virginia has leaned Republican. Between 1952 and 2004, the state voted for every conservative presidential candidate, except for the 1964 election of President Lyndon B. Johnson. However, the rapid growth in Northern Virginia during the 1990s shifted the political landscape. Since 2008, Democrats have won Virginia in five consecutive presidential elections, though by narrow margins. In the 2024 presidential election, Kamala Harris defeated Donald Trump by only five points.

2024 Presidential election results in Virginia. Source: Virginia Department of Elections.

Virginia comprises a unique blend of rural conservatism, urban liberalism, and suburban swing voters. The state has about 320,000 full-time federal employees, with 190,000 federal jobs are based there. This job sector constitutes a significant portion of Virginia’s workforce, and the recent news has become a major issue in this year’s race.

In April, CNN reported that more than 121,000 workers have been laid off since the beginning of Trump’s second term by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). These cuts have highlighted Virginia’s vulnerable economy and made job security a central campaign issue.

Compared to a Presidential General Election, voter turnout for gubernatorial elections is significantly lower. Last November, Virginia’s voter turnout was 73%, the highest on the East Coast. However, that percentage drops considerably in state elections. Virginia state elections attracts about 42-50% of voters. In 2013, approximately 43% of registered voters cast a ballot.  

In 2021 there were record breaking numbers, with 55% of Virginians voting, the highest turnout for a gubernatorial election in about quarter century. Virginia passed 14 bills to improve voter turnout, such as 45 days of no-excuse early voting, expanding identification options, and designating Election Day a statewide holiday. Because of the state’s unique election schedule, these races are more dependent on voter enthusiasm, local issues, and campaign mobilization.

“I have only voted in presidential elections.Until now, I never realized that [the governor’s race] is held in off-years or the impact it is has on the nation.” – Alana Peyton, voter in Hanover County

To reach voters like Peyton, both campaigns are using different media strategies. Sears is relying more on traditional media, TV, radio and in-person events, to engage more traditional and older electorates. Her messaging places a large emphasis on patriotism, faith, and tradition.

On the other hand, Spanberger is embracing a digital-first approach, using platforms such as Instagram and TikTok to connect with the younger generation and tech-savvy voters. Because she is catering to a younger demographic, Sears has begun to label her as an extreme left winged, or “woke” politician.

Fundraising is crucial in elections, and this one is no exception. Expected to be Virginia’s most expensive gubernatorial campaign, Spanberger has raised around $16 million since launching her campaign in 2023. In the first quarter of 2025, she has raised $6.7 million, a record-breaking number for the first quarter of an election year. Comparatively, Sears has raised around $3.1 million, a record for the Virginia GOP.

Sears’ alignment with Donald Trump could be seen as a strength and a liability. It cements her position with Trump loyalists, it risks alienating moderates and swing voters. “There are advantages for those in strong support of Trump,” Tedesco said, “But that is not going to win over any liberal voters, and it may even scare away moderate voters.”

Voters understand what this election could mean for the future of the U.S. “[The political climate] is very tense right now,” Peyton said, “It feels like you are on one extreme or the other. Which is really frustrating because politicians should be able to work with their cohorts to improve our country as a whole, not just serve one group.”

Not only is this race highlighting key national issues like education curriculum, reproductive rights, economic development, and public safety. It is also confronting a bigger question: is there is any bipartisanship left in the United States?

“In the past year, I have become much more in tune with national politics,” Peyton said, “I plan on voting in the [gubernatorial and local] elections because ultimately, change starts at the bottom.”

Editor’s Note: Dr. John Tedesco is the Director of the Virginia Tech School of Communication which publishes The News Feed NRV.

Bike helmets key tool in bicyclists’ safety, among other practices 

By Bethany Lenhardt, crime, safety and justice reporter 

Biking as transportation is valuable for various reasons, however, biking quickly loses its charm if safety is not a priority. Everyone on the road – bikes, cars, pedestrians – contributes to the safety of the environment and must recognize their role.  

“I’ve seen a number of benefits from bicycle commuting. Cycling to and from work and when I run errands is a way for me to get some exercise,” said Nicholas Quint, Sustainable Transportation Manager at Virginia Tech. “Also, I’ve been able to save a lot of money from gas and just the other maintenance related expenses with the car, and yes, there are maintenance related expenses with a bicycle, but to a much lesser degree.” 

Quint is based out of Virginia Tech’s Transit Center, located off Perry Street Garage. Inside the center is office space, a break area for Blacksburg Transit drivers and the Hokie Bike Hub.  

The Bike Hub is a self-service repair station, where passersby can come in and learn techniques and use the tools to execute repairs, but no items are available for purchase; they do not sell any parts as per an agreement with local bike shops. If an individual comes in with a bike that needs new parts, the Bike Hub workers will help them understand what they need to purchase to successfully execute repairs. They aid approximately 3000 people every year, according to Quint.  

Hokie Bike Hub garage space. Photo by: Bethany Lenhardt

“The Hokie Bike Hub is a learning laboratory,” said Quint. “We are a space dedicated to hands on learning when it comes to working on your bicycle or even an E-scooter, unicycle or skateboard. Our staff are there to teach them how to how to work on their bicycles. We don’t perform any work for folks, and if the problem is bad enough that someone needs to replace a part, we can put together a parts list for them to wherever they can go to get those and then help them out once they have them on hand.” 

“The Hokie Bike Hub is a learning laboratory.”

Nicholas Quint

The emphasis on learning is purposeful. Ultimately, a bicycle is a mode of transport and also a vesicle of the rider’s safety. Proper care and upkeep of a bike is step one to ensuring the rider arrives at their destination safely. The Bike Hub and local bike shops help to ensure the bike remains in top running order and that the rider obtains the skills to fix issues on the fly.  

Another factor in bike safety is appropriate behavior. According to the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles, bicyclists are subject to many of the same laws as those in motor vehicles. Additionally, drivers are subject to additional laws to prioritize safety in the shared space. These include keeping at least 3 feet of berth, including the mirror, and slowing down when passing a bicyclist on the road and changing lanes if this operation is not possible.  

Bikes may be ridden on and off roadways, excluding all Interstate Highways and when posted signs prohibit the activity. The bicyclist must act like a pedestrian when on the sidewalk, and act like a vehicle when on the road. Cherry-picking and being unpredictable with what laws they choose to obey endangers everyone involved.  

“Weaving in and out of traffic so that you’re unpredictable is not helpful; it’s dangerous,” said Quint. “It’s how others perceive you and expect your next move. Using hand signals, like when you’re going to turn, is also important.”  

The third aspect of safety is equipment, specifically a helmet. Virginia does not have a state bicycle helmet law; however, localities can choose to require the use of helmets by adolescent riders age 14 and under, in accordance with Virginia Code §46.2-906.1. The localities that abide by this rule can be found on the Virginia Department of Transportation website.  

Even with local ordinances, enforcing the use of a helmet is incredibly difficult given the number of children riding bikes at any time, says Dr. Barry Miller, Director of Outreach and Business Development for the Virginia Tech Helmet Lab. However, he highly recommends that everyone – regardless of age – should wear a helmet. 

“We have research that shows any helmet will drastically reduce 70 to 80% risk of concussion versus no helmet at all,” said Dr. Miller. “Helmets do wonders.” 

“Helmets do wonders.”

Dr. Barry Miller

The Helmet Lab seeks to quantify and understand what happens inside the helmet during real-life head impacts in order to evaluate which helmets are the safest for the activity. It all started with the football department asking Dr. Stefan Duma, the founder of the lab and a professor of biomedical engineering and mathematics, if he could determine the safest helmet for the team. Having just returned from a conference that demonstrated sensors inside military helmets, he was inspired to conduct an experiment.  

“We started putting sensors inside football players helmets,” said Dr. Miller. “They agreed to be subjects, so there was 50 players that we collected data on for the initial five years, and basically what we figured out is, when they got injured or concussed on the field, we started pairing that with what the helmet data tells us in linear and rotational head accelerations. From that, we created a bivariate risk function so when certain levels of acceleration are hit, the probability of concussion goes up.” 

Virginia Tech Helmet Lab test rig. Photo by: Bethany Lenhardt

The fundamental question is: How does an individual hit their head when they do X? They replicate that impact with test rigs in the lab and have created a system based on a summation of tests and data that determines which helmet better reduces the rapid head movements and therefore gets a better rating for the purpose of wearing it for that activity, specifically. They have set-ups that are unique to the sport, including one for cycling. That system is patented and was named the star rating system. These ratings are publicly available on their website. 

“The star ratings are consumer facing,” said Dr. Miller. “Part of our public service mission is to inform consumers on the relative difference between helmets. Just like any other thing, there’s product differentiation. Consider a Fiat versus the Ford F-150; there’s huge safety differences between those vehicles, and even in the everyday products you buy at the grocery store, you know, is it name brand or is it off brand?” 

Various helmets in the United States require certification to be sold because of safety concerns. Bicycle helmets are certified by the Consumer Product Safety Commission and must pass their standards to be compliant with the Consumer Product Safety Act. According to the CPSC, they certify a helmet when it passes four tests: it doesn’t block the rider’s vision, it doesn’t fall off when the rider falls off the bike, the straps don’t stretch enough to allow the helmet to fall off or become too displaced, and that the helmet “significantly reduces” force to the head when hit.  

“We’ve really revolutionized sport helmets,” said Dr. Miller. “Helmets must be certified at some organization. Bike helmets are the Consumer Product Safety Committee, football are the National Operating Committee on the Standards of Athletic Equipment, etc. All these different organizations control basic helmet performance and the point to pass or fail is catastrophic head injury, so skull fracture and death. The helmet lab has developed assistance, and we supplement those mandatory certifications to be legally sold with real world sport specific helmet ratings.” 

While serious bicycle crashes are a major reason to wear a helmet, even a simple fall that results in hitting your head on the ground can be dangerous. The National Safety Council reports that there were 1,377 preventable bicycle crash deaths in 2023. Additionally, they report that “The number of preventable nonfatal injuries also increased by 1% in 2023 but has declined by 29%, from 480,212 in 2014 to 341,774 in 2023.” 

Given these statistics, it appears to be imperative to wear a helmet to prevent serious injury, although no amount of precaution can stop the most serious of accidents. Numbers aside, Quint still recommends biking as a source of happiness and perspective, what he calls “bike joy.” 

“I acquired a bike shortly after moving to Richmond,” said Quint. “After a semester, I sold my car; I was kind of bicycling out of necessity but also to experience what that was like because there are some people that driving a car is not an option for them, so I thought it was important for me to gain that perspective. Most of the time you get on a bike, and you just can’t help but smile and be happy about it. I think that bike joy, as they call it, is another big benefit.” 

Whether a rider chooses to bike for purpose or pleasure, putting effort into the bike’s upkeep remains a top priority for safety on the road. Additionally, familiarizing oneself with local ordinances and obeying the rules can help prevent accidents. Finally, purchasing and wearing a highly rated helmet can help reduce fatal injury in the event of a crash.  

Produce Prescription: How a USDA Grant Fights Food Insecurity in Southwest Virginia 

By Elizabeth Ann Miller, health and wellness reporter 

Produce grown by Crooked Porch Farm, Blacksburg Farmers Market. Photo by Elizabeth Ann Miller. 

In a region where fresh produce can be scarce and healthcare access challeng, a new initiative aims to lighten both burdens. Southwest Virginia Prescription Assistance (SWPRx) has been awarded $479,000 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), for a collaborative program that combines healthcare with nutrition. 

The grant, part of the USDA’s Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP), supports efforts to improve food security in rural and underserved areas. It will fund a three-year pilot designed to provide patients with fresh produce prescriptions, nutrition education, and access to local food resources. The goal remains to improve health outcomes across the region.   

“This grant allows us to scale that impact and reach people who need it most,” said Maureen McNamara Best, project director at LEAP. 

Due to its rural nature, high rates of diet-related illnesses have long plagued Southwest Virginia. Patients enrolled in Medicaid, especially those with conditions like hypertension and diabetes, often face difficulty accessing nutritious food. Through SWPRx, participating patients will be given weekly produce prescriptions, redeemable at farmers markets, food pantries, and local outlets affiliated with Virginia Fresh Match. 

The target population includes residents in Roanoke City, Franklin County, Floyd County, and Radford City. Over the next three years, more than 300 participants will undergo a six-month program that includes peer support, structured learning, and nutritional interventions designed to foster sustainable health behavior changes. 

Southwest Virginia Produce Rx is a partnership effort, joining an array of community-based organizations. The Local Environmental Agriculture Project (LEAP) is a nonprofit in Roanoke that holds the USDA grant and manages the program’s logistics. Carilion Clinic provides healthcare services and referrals. Feeding Southwest Virginia, Virginia Fresh Match, and Radford University take on distribution, retail access, and data evaluation. With help from each collaborator, LEAP integrates farmers markets, food trucks, community stores, and a kitchen.  

“SWPRx builds on years of experience with smaller scale produce prescription programs,” Best said. 

The USDA emphasized that these awards are part of a broader national strategy to reduce health disparities and promote food access in underserved communities.  

“Nutrition incentive projects like this are key to empowering families to make healthier food choices,” said Stacy Dean, deputy undersecretary for food, nutrition and consumer services at the USDA. “They also strengthen local food systems by connecting farmers with the people who need their products most. We are excited to expand the success of LEAP’s Fresh Foods Rx pilot program to other communities in the region. The program not only increases access to fresh produce but also promotes long-term health by fostering behavioral change through peer support and education.” 

Virginia Fresh Match is a critical player in this system. It is a statewide network that matches SNAP benefits for produce purchases. Local outlets serve as redemption sites for the prescriptions distributed through SWPRx. Virginia Fresh Match allows participants to maintain access to affordable produce even after their six-month program ends. 

“We want people to walk away not just with a bag of vegetables, but the knowledge and confidence to integrate them into their lives.” – Maureen McNamara Best 

The intention is to help bridge the affordability gap, especially for patients just beginning to make dietary changes. 

As expected, this large initiative brings challenges. Transportation barriers, lack of nutrition education, and limited grocery store access are all significant hurdles for rural communities in the region. Many residents must travel long distances to access quality food options. Others simply don’t have the tools or time to learn new recipes or dietary habits. 

“Working with multiple outlets and partners can involve a lot of moving parts,” Best said. “With strong work plans and consistent feedback, the benefits far outweigh the logistical challenges.” 

Community retailers and farmers markets can ease these challenges by serving as both produce prescription and interactive hubs. They create space for conversation, trust, and connection. That’s where lasting health changes can really take root. 

Blacksburg Farmers Market information and SNAP distribution tent. Photo by Elizabeth Ann Miller. 

As an agricultural pillar in the New River Valley, the Blacksburg Farmers Market offers more than just seasonal produce. The market fosters a culture of community wellness and sustainability. Located in the heart of downtown Blacksburg, it draws a mix of residents, local families, and Virginia Tech students seeking fresh, local options. The market has long participated in the SNAP program and continues to support food access and local agriculture. Farmers here aren’t just vendors. Farmers can be educators, friends, and advocates for health through food.  

Theresa Allen, owner of Peace and Harmony Farms and a regular vendor at the market, sees the SWPRx initiative as a great addition to the values already rooted in her farm to market practice.  

“I believe deeply in eating off the land and using what we grow as medicine,” Allen said.  

Allen has watched firsthand how a vibrant farmers market can shift the way a community relates to and consumes food.  

“Markets like ours aren’t just about shopping. I love the way they force people to slow down, ask questions, and form relationships,” she added. “That’s what makes programs like SWPRx so meaningful. They connect it all between nourishment, healing, and community.” 

For students and low-income families navigating food insecurity, these markets can become weekly support. With future potential of serving as redemption sites for produce prescriptions, the Blacksburg Farmers Market and its farmers can also help remove barriers to fresh food while continuing to foster a welcoming culture. 

“This initiative reflects the very fact that food can heal you. When you grow it with care and people consume it with love, it becomes a powerful tool for being your best.” – Theresa Allen 

The goal of SWPRx is to build a replicable model that integrates food systems into public health infrastructure. The program will track participant outcomes such as improved fruit and vegetable consumption, better management of chronic diseases, and healthcare utilization changes. Researchers at Radford University will analyze the data to help refine and adapt the program over time. As it is in the first year of implementation, there is no impact data. The program cohort launched this April and is constantly tracking and evaluating.  

While the initiative is grounded in Southwest Virginia, its implications are broader than the New River Valley. The USDA grant is part of a national movement to recognize and invest in food as health. According to the CDC, only 10% of American adults consume enough fruits and vegetables daily. This trend not only contributes to widespread chronic illness but increasing healthcare costs as well.  

Programs like SWPRx aim to disrupt that cycle by focusing on prevention through access and education. Instead of reacting after the fact to illness with medication alone, they invest in proactive lifestyle changes that can lead to long-term, sustainable improvements. 

“When someone learns how to cook with fresh ingredients, understands their value, and sees their own health change, it’s transformative,” said Best. “We’ve seen people start off hesitant and finish empowered.” 

The SWPRx team also emphasizes the importance of connecting participants to broader community support systems.  

“We don’t want this to be a one-time intervention,” she added. “We’re building bridges to local resources that can support people long after the program ends.” 

The expansion of SWPRx comes at a time when rural healthcare systems are under increasing pressure. Southwest Virginia, like many underserved regions, faces rising rates of diet-related disease and limited access to specialized care. 

This grant may not solve every challenge, but it does show how partnerships between healthcare providers and food systems can offer meaningful, scalable solutions that improve access to food and long-term health outcomes. SWPRX shows the power of cross-sector collaboration.  

Over the next three years, public health experts, community leaders, and policymakers will be watching closely. If SWPRx proves effective, it could serve as a blueprint for other rural regions similarly seeking to bridge the gap between nutrition and healthcare. 

“It’s not just about getting food into people’s hands. It’s about changing the systems that determine whether or not people can live healthy lives.” – Maureen McNamara Best 

Best’s words capture the heart of the initiative. Food is not only nutrition. Food is medicine and a pathway to a full life. 

Produce grown by Crooked Porch Farm, Blacksburg Farmers Market. Photo by Elizabeth Ann Miller. 

From classroom to conference room: Virginia Tech engineering students tackle real-world challenges 

By Elizabeth Hill, education reporter 

Students present their senior design project at the Virginia Tech Industrial and Systems Engineering Senior Symposium.

Each fall, a new cohort of Virginia Tech industrial and systems engineering seniors begin the final phase of their undergraduate journey, not with exams or essays, but by solving real problems for companies.  

The senior design program, part of the Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, challenges students to serve clients worldwide over a nine-month period. Teams are paired with company sponsors and have the responsibility of analyzing data, improving systems and delivering tangible results.  

Students meet with their clients regularly to align goals, ask questions and present their work in progress. These clients are more than just evaluators; they are active collaborators who offer insights from their own industry experience.

At the end of the academic year, their findings are presented at the Senior Design and Undergraduate Research Symposium, a professional conference where students deliver their findings to faculty, peers and industry representatives. The 2025 symposium was hosted at the Skelton Conference Center, located within The Inn at Virginia Tech. Recognized as the premier event facility in Blacksburg, the venue offers advanced technological resources and a seasoned events team, making it a preferred location for high-profile academic and professional gatherings. 

Eileen Van Aken, department head of the Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISE), shared her thoughts on the program’s impact with Virginia Tech News. “It is remarkable to see the impact of our senior design program at such a high level,” she said. “We continue to be impressed by our students and their commitment to delivering strategic, timely, and cost-effective solutions to their clients within our senior design program. We know this real-world experience will be applicable long after they graduate.” 

For students, that impact goes beyond academic achievement; it becomes a defining moment in their education. After years of lectures, labs and exams, senior design projects offer a rare opportunity to step into the role of a professional and tackle the kind of complex problems they will likely face after graduation. 

“Getting the chance to integrate skills from almost every class in the ISE curriculum was truly special. It put a lot of the theories and formulas that might not be intuitive in a textbook into context.” 

Vivek Gopalam, a senior design team member for The Boeing Company

While the academic value of these projects is undeniable, many students found the hands-on, off-campus components just as impactful. 

The excitement of leaving the Blacksburg campus and traveling for on-site company visits added an intriguing and memorable layer to the projects. “Pick a project that travels, as I got to go to Colorado twice and Chicago once. All amazing experiences,” said Matthew Speciale, a senior design team member for Woodward. For Speciale and his team, their trips to Fort Collins, Colorado, were among the highlights of their senior design experience, offering both professional insight and personal adventure. 

Speciale’s team visited Woodward’s facility on two separate occasions, each lasting a week, to gain hands-on experience and a deeper understanding of the project they were tackling. These on-site visits allowed them to work directly with the company and gain crucial insight into the operational side of their project. 

When the team was not present at the facility, the students took full advantage of Colorado’s natural beauty. From skiing at Winter Park to hiking in Rocky Mountain National Park, the students experienced the perfect blend of professional growth and personal adventure. 

For Speciale and his team, the combination of immersive work and unforgettable travel made their senior design project not just an academic requirement, but a defining chapter in their Virginia Tech experience. 

Photo courtesy of Matthew Speciale: After three days of hands-on work at Woodward’s Fort Collins facility, Matthew Speciale (on the left) and two of his teammates took a break to hit the slopes at Winter Park. 

For Mollie McKee, whose team partnered with Verizon, the early weeks of the project were filled with uncertainty. Unlike projects with clearly defined deliverables, her team’s assignment came with an open-ended scope. The lack of structure was challenging at first but ultimately led to valuable learning. 

“Our project was not strictly scoped in the beginning, which made for a really interesting first few meetings,” McKee said. “We set expectations and did the usual team bonding activities, but we really started to dive into the project once we visited one of the sites.” 

Each semester, students in the senior design program receive a list of industry-sponsored projects that outline genuine engineering challenges. After reviewing their options, the students rank their top choices. Teams are then matched with companies ranging from global tech firms to defense contractors, offering students hands-on experience in industries they may have never explored. 

For McKee, that meant stepping into unfamiliar territory. 

Drawing on her previous internship experience, she described the program as a very abbreviated version of an internship. However, unlike her prior roles, this project required her to approach problem-solving in a completely new environment. 

“It was an opportunity to explore a space I probably never would’ve considered otherwise,” she said. “And that ended up being one of the most rewarding parts.” 

One of the biggest lessons McKee learned was the importance of listening, especially to the people most closely connected to the issue. 

“I think talking to the people who are at ground zero of the problems you’re trying to solve at a larger scale is the most important place to start,” she said. “A lot of people, myself included sometimes, tend to jump to solving problems they don’t understand, and that leads to frustration from those on the ground.” 

By embracing the unknown, asking better questions and listening to those with firsthand experience, McKee and her team were able to find direction and purpose. Her experience reflects the heart of the senior design program: not only addressing operational challenges faced by major companies, but learning how to lead, adapt and grow in the face of the unknown. 

Mollie McKee speaking with industry professionals at the Virginia Tech Industrial and Systems Engineering Senior Symposium.

he students’ journeys, filled with discovery, collaboration and growth, came to a close at one of the department’s most anticipated events of the year. 

The 2025 Senior Design and Undergraduate Research Symposium marked the final milestone in a yearlong journey of applied problem-solving. Throughout the day, teams presented their findings through formal presentations and interactive poster sessions, engaging with faculty, fellow students, and industry representatives. The event served as both a culmination and celebration of the knowledge and skills students developed during their time in the program. 

To close out the symposium, several student teams were recognized for outstanding performance. Awards were presented across five categories: Application of ISE Tools, Project Performance, Innovation and Creativity, Integration and Implementation, and People’s Choice. Each award reflected a different dimension of excellence. 

For many students, the symposium was a rewarding opportunity to reflect on how far they had come.  

“It was so much fun, and it was nice to reflect on how far we came from the start of the project—showcasing everything to a packed room with your friends and professionals was a great way to end the project.”

Matthew Speciale, a senior design team member for Woodward

Others found the experience validating in terms of industry relevance and technical achievement. “I was very proud of our performance in the poster session and presentation,” said Vivek Gopalam, whose team worked with The Boeing Company. “We had industry representatives come talk to us about how pressing the issue that we were solving was to them, and how exciting it was to see research being done in this area. Our efforts paid off as we were told by the ISE teaching team that we were an extremely high scoring team.” 

These recognitions highlighted the program’s emphasis not just on delivering solutions, but on integrating core industrial and systems engineering principles in innovative and meaningful ways.  

As the symposium concluded, students walked away with more than just final deliverables, they left with real-world experience, new connections, and a sense of accomplishment. For many, the event was a turning point: the transition from student to emerging professional. 

By bridging classroom instruction with practical application, Virginia Tech’s ISE Senior Design program continues to prepare graduates for the complex challenges of the modern workforce, equipped not only with knowledge, but with confidence earned through experience. 

Attacks on media leaves uncertainty for graduating seniors

By Janae Neely, education reporter

It seems that with each passing day, the media industry takes another hit. Whether it’s the cessation of federal funding or banning select news organizations from the Oval Office, the Trump Administration has initiated an attack on the press and media within its first 100 days in office. 

Journalism has been present in society since the beginning of time, with a knack for being able to shift and adapt its business model to fit the needs of its audience. However, these hits to the press have left an overwhelming cloud of uncertainty over the media space. This uncertainty has especially affected graduating college students who are looking to build careers within these spaces. 

For seniors who are looking for advice on how to enter the media industry, luckily, at Virginia Tech, there are events held in an effort to help these students and educate them with the resources available in order to have a long and successful career. One of these events is Comm Week, a week full of professional and networking events to help students prepare for post-grad careers. This year’s Comm Week was organized by Brandi Quesenberry, Undergraduate Director and Senior Instructor in the School of Communications. 

Brandi Quesenberry. Image Credits: Virginia Tech

“Comm Week is something that we started in 2018. We took a hiatus for a couple of years because of COVID, and it really is an opportunity for the School of Communication to offer all of our majors, so journalism, sports media analytics, comm, PR, and advertising, as well as any of our minors, to engage with us as a falculty or as a school, as well as our organizations” said Quesenberry. “What we want to do through an event like Comm Week is highlight our student organizations, provide those organizations opportunities to better promote or have a wider promotion of events and connections that they have, and what their goals and missions are”. 

This year’s event included partnerships with Lambda Pi Eta, the Communications Honor Society on campus, and the Society of Professional Journalists. One of the major events featured guest speaker Ryan Ripken, a former baseball player who now owns his own media company. Navigating the post-graduate world can be tricky and confusing, Quesenberry gives this advice to those enetering the media and press space during this fragile time, “I do think it’s important to develop relationships with your faculty members, who have either worked in the industry or potentially still work in the industry, and who have their finger on the pulse of research and current trends in the industry, even if they are full time faculty members.” Quesenberry also noted that, “You can lean into their networks, and certainly pick their brains and find out more information from them.” 

Lastly, Quesenberry wants students to keep in mind that forging connections and networking is important at these times, “Make sure you stay marketable with your skills. So, the skills that we are teaching in our classes, making sure that you’re taking full advantage, Virginia Tech has tons of resources through LinkedIn Learning. There are just a wide variety of options to help you hone your skills, so regardless of what the landscape is politically or what the economy looks like, you’re gonna be marketable, you’re gonna be employable in a wide variety of industries”. 

The Trump Administration’s continuous attack on the press and media has left a lot of questions surrounding the legality of these executive orders and how this affects the meaning of freedom of speech and freedom of the press. There are also several questions regarding President Trump’s ultimate goal in his slow but steady attempts to censor the press. Understanding what this means is essential to graduating seniors who are building their careers within the media space. 

Dr. Cayce Myers is an author and professor of Communication Law at Virginia Tech. When speaking on these executive orders, Dr. Myers stated, “I don’t know if it has infringement rights on freedom of speech, but it certainly does pivot the business model of those organizations.” he continued stating, “I would expect that in some ways, these platforms will survive through a different model. The public television model and also the public radio model come out of an era that is pre-streaming cable reality. And so, the way they find their marketplace is very different than the world they entered.” 

Dr. Cayce Myers. Image Credits: WDBJ7.

In terms of what these orders mean for the quality of news sharing, Dr. Myers commented, “Now what does this look like in terms of programming quality, what does this mean in terms of some of the things they’ll be able to do? That likely will change.” Myers continued, “But, I think that this overall will be a shift that’ll change the nature of their business. I don’t know that it will eliminate them completely, I think they may be able to function, and their content will get out in other ways, but that remains to be seen.” 

Many have wondered what the end goal is for the Trump Administration, and what it is exactly that they want to come out of this. Dr. Myers has two different reasonings for why President Trump has set his sights on the press, “Well, I think the ultimate goal is reduction of cost of government, and that’s an overarching goal that like I said, this has been a Republican talking point for a long time, cutting the bureaucracy of the government and streamlining it and providing services that are essential, and then cutting extraneous services. I think another part of it is that there is an underlying criticism of television, of public radio, that it has a very left-winged bent to it and it’s not a nonpartisan outlet, it’s a partisan outlet. And so, I think there is this sense of a lack of support for continuing funding for something that is kind of seen as antithetical to many of the Republican talking points.” 

One of the most interesting things about President Trump’s time in office thus far is not only the surplus of executive orders he has signed, but the quickness of these orders.

“The problem with executive orders is that they don’t have the staying power that a law does. The staying power is just not the same. So there’s this immediacy, but there’s not that long-term effect. It gives, I think, in some ways, in that context, you can have a sort of whiplash for people to kind of figure out ‘What is the norm here?’” – Dr. Cayce Myers, Communication Law Professor 

Many view Trump’s orders as a way to control the narrative and only push out the stories that he believes are worthy of being news. For graduating students who are worried about the uncertainty surrounding the press, Myers says keep these things in mind “I think for students entering the media world, what they should be more concerned about is the economics behind the media structure. Because this is a small subset of media when you’re talking about public funded media. When you’re talking about media in general, we’re in a world of convergence, and we’re in a world where the most interesting thing is that you used to have these big corporations like CBS News or ABC. And they’re being competed with and being outdone by individual podcasters and people who have no infrastructure or very little, and it is like they are able to compete with these multi-million dollar industries.” Myers continued, “I think that is the bigger challenge is how do you keep up with this changing economic structure of the media.” 

“In the creative fields, you have to market yourself differently. A lot of other fields don’t require a portfolio, because you want to be able to showcase your work. I think you also have to learn to describe things a little bit differently, because you have to describe your art.” – Leigh Anne Byrd, Assistant Director for Career Development and College Relations 

Byrd advises that flexibility, persistence, and perseverance are the most important qualities to have when attracting employers in the changing media world. “The keyword that we always heard during Covid was pivot, so thinking about different avenues or different places that you didn’t have in mind at first.” Byrd also discussed the increasing importance of networking and prioritizing quality over quantity when it comes to filling out job applications. 

The media world has seen many changes over the past five months, and a lot of these changes don’t have solid outcomes or solutions. But this isn’t anything new. Journalism and the media have consistently revamped themselves and have still survived despite it all. Media will always have a place in society, and no amount of censoring can change that.